My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536908
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2020 6:40:29 PM
Creation date
2/24/2020 3:25:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0536908
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0021186
FACILITY_NAME
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE RECEIVERSHIP ESTAT
STREET_NUMBER
248
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17728020
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Steven Donell -2- 10 May 2013 <br /> PQL=0.3 mg/kg, respectively. However, the California Department of Public Health <br /> recommends a 2 ug/L detection limit for reporting arsenic in groundwater. Regional <br /> Water Board staff is concerned that the reporting limit for EPA Method 6010b is unable <br /> to meet the 2 ug/L reporting limit. In a telephone conversation on 9 May 2013, Mr. <br /> Cloven agreed to.change to EPA Method 200.8 to analyze arsenic in groundwater and <br /> soil samples. <br /> 3. Section I-B. Topography states: As part of this work plan, therefore, a survey of surface. <br /> drainage features-i.e., inlets, outlets, outfalls-is proposed." Staff concur with the <br /> proposal to map all drainage features and provide the information on a map in the Site <br /> Assessment Report. <br /> 4. A second set of Former Boring Locations (SB-1007, example provided in Figure Key) <br /> were added to Figure 7 and Al Work Plan Investigation Sampling Locations. These <br /> additional former boring locations were also included in Figure A2-Area#1 Septic <br /> System, but were not included in Figures A-3 (SB-1001 is missing) and A-4 (SB-1007 <br /> and SB-1005 are missing)for Areas 2 and 3. Please include the additional former <br /> boring locations in Figures A-3 and A-4 in the Site Assessment Report to ensure that all <br /> previously collected data points are included in these Figures. <br /> 5. Section II.I-F. Well Sampling: Lists Nitrate Chloride as a constituent for groundwater <br /> testing. Nitrate Chloride appears to be a typo, and the Work Plan should list separate <br /> nitrate and chloride analyses, but should not be confused with CINO3-chloride nitrate. <br /> Staff concur with the EPA Method 300.0 for nitrate and chloride analyses. <br /> If you have any questions regarding this letter or project, you may contact me at(916) 464-4825 <br /> or by email at apalmernwaterboards.ca.gov . <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Ann M. Palmer <br /> Private Site Cleanup <br /> Cc: Peter Cloven, Pinnacle Environmental, (Electronic Copy) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.