Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br /> 0 <br /> qordoji Tedearch <br /> 1065 S. UNION ROAD <br /> MANTECA, CALIF. 95336 SEP 2 6 1984 <br /> PHONE (209) 623-2061 <br /> SINCE 1950 SAN jpp,QUIN LOCA! <br /> 64EA1_TN nisTRIr <br /> September 22, 1984 <br /> 'Mr. Brad Parsons Re: Plan of Correction <br /> Department of Health Services Yours of 8/21/84 <br /> 4250 Power Inn Road <br /> Sacramento, California 95826 <br /> Dear Mr. Parsons: <br /> Regarding the points of deficiency of my original proposition I will set <br /> down, in the order of your citations, their answers. I hope they are satisfactory. <br /> If not, we will try again. <br /> 1. The containers and their contents are (and have been) identifiable as <br /> to their disposition eligibility. Each chemical or compound has its own characteD. <br /> The items that are peculiar to my inventory are very easily discerned. The compound <br /> constituents can be had from the manufacturers thereof. I think I have them all. <br /> Further, the military specifications are quite exacting. Contrary to what surplus <br /> people may have said, government materials are of higher quality by far than their <br /> counterparts on the commercial market. Sure, the government sells contaminated, <br /> recyclable and waste things but never without clear notice to the potential buyer. <br /> In addition to this the buyer is under a duty to himself to check out what he intends <br /> to buy. My proclamation that a given item is marketable (and marketability is the <br /> critical criterion, as once such is established, consideration of recyclability and <br /> disposability is obviated) should carry some weight of credibility, if not because <br /> I have a lot of years working with these materials, certainly because I can back up <br /> what I say by proving saleability. How does one prove saleability? By selling it <br /> with a buy-back-if-not-acceptable transaction. If the customer accepts it, in- <br /> corporates it into his product and is happy with the results, I submit the demands <br /> for identification as "marketable" are met. I claim the same accord of deference <br /> as to the prima facie good quality of my merchandise as Van Waters and Rogers or <br /> Great Western Chemical or any other big company. I will identify the containers <br /> that are marketable according to all requirements of DOT and Title 49 of the Code <br /> of Federal regulations. Items that are recyclable (I don't believe I have any) <br /> will be containerized, labeled and sold after approval by DHS. Disposable items <br /> will be disposed of according to their several categories after official approval <br /> of DHS. <br /> 2, Identified containers will be categorized as to whether they contain re- <br /> cyclable or disposable materials by indicating such on the container and having <br /> labels that include the predominant hazard property plus information revealing the <br /> character of materials involved. They will be packaged in a manner and form com- <br /> patible with their peculiar character. For instance, hydrofluoric acid would not <br /> be put into glass or metal but into polyethylene containers. Transportation will <br /> be be by myself according to CFR 49 on marketable and recyclable materials and by a <br />