Laserfiche WebLink
APPENDIX A - 'REPORTING30 August 1991 <br /> corrective actions are to be completed the tank owner will be informed to proceed <br /> within 30 days of the system shutdown); with soil remediation by completing and <br /> timelines for activities currently implementing the Soil Remediation Plan <br /> underway or proposed. Compare new (SRP) or to continue the investigation. If <br /> timelines to those previously submitted ground water is found to be impacted a <br /> with a written explanation for changes; Problem Assessment Report (PAR) is needed <br /> and to define the problem area and propose <br /> estimates of the quantity of remedial measures. The Final Remedial Pian <br /> contamination remaining in soil and (FRP) incorporates the accepted plan, time <br /> ground water, and time for completing schedule for implementation and operation, <br /> remediation. and a contingency plan to correct potential <br /> The information may be submitted as.a letter problems. <br /> with a site map to the regulating agencies. Reports are to be submitted to the LIA for <br /> approval, and to the Regional Board for incor- <br /> poration in the Underground Tank data base. <br /> SPECIFIC REQUIRE,I MNTS Where extensive soil problems exist, the <br /> reports also may be reviewed by the Regional <br /> SECTION III MVESTIGATION Board. <br /> Once a tank has been removed, there may be Site cav � yporkDz= (ScTf9 _ <br /> significant soil problems which can not be 2-2652(c� ¢2M(c)(d) <br /> resolved by a "scoop and run" cleanup of <br /> minor overspills, but remain to be identified The workplan is used to develop preliminary <br /> and remediated. To pursue a successful site information to direct s u b s e q u e n t <br /> remediation plan, the lateral and vertical investigation(s). <br /> extent of soil contamination must be defined. <br /> The preliminary investigations are critical. BacA;gmund <br /> Failure to provide the information because the - Name and address of site, tank <br /> work was done impatiently or improperly is owner, and contact person, if <br /> expensive because it requires backtrarking and different. <br /> impedes subsequent- investigations. The - Area map snowing site location relative <br /> information is needed for the LIA and to nearby landmarks such as rivers, <br /> Regional Board to make a proper derision. <br /> highways, urban or industrial areas, etc. <br /> As shown on Figure A-1, the investigations are (approximate scale equivalent to a USGS <br /> topographic map or road map). <br /> procedural and linked Information developed - Scale drawing of the site showing <br /> for one is included in the next phase. The Site adjacent streets and buildings, septic <br /> Contamination Workplan (SCW) prepares tanks and leachfields, and underground. <br /> basic information required for any subsequent utility lines (approximate scale: 1 inch = <br /> work and may be sufficient for the LIA to 20 feet). <br /> certify closure. The Prelimtnary Investigation - Layout of all tanks and piping systems <br /> and Evaluation Report (PIER) determines on thero <br /> whether soil only is impacted or if ground p � each tanker <br /> water also must be investigated. Once the LIA - for content. <br /> decision is made, based upon a complete PIER Results tank tests and summary of <br /> other initial <br /> l site work completed <br /> A-4 <br />