My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND BIOSPARGE EVALUATION REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
1444
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0527031
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND BIOSPARGE EVALUATION REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2020 1:37:52 PM
Creation date
3/4/2020 12:03:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND BIOSPARGE EVALUATION REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0527031
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0018318
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER COLUMBO / TOSCANA BAKERY
STREET_NUMBER
1444
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16503005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1444 S LINCOLN ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> ' wells. All drilling equipment and sampling tools were decontaminated prior to beginning the <br /> field activities and again prior to starting each boring (or as necessary). All reusable <br /> equipment was washed thoroughly with a Liquinox (or equivalent) solution and/or a heated <br /> pressure washer. A PSC geologist supervised the drilling, sampling, and well construction <br /> activities. The decon water generated during the field activities was stored in DOT- <br /> approved 55-gallon drums. <br /> ' 2.2.1 Soil Boring Logging and Sampling <br /> Soil sampling commenced on 5-foot intervals for lithologic identification and laboratory <br /> ' analysis. The samples were collected in clean brass and/or stainless steel liners contained <br /> within California-modified split-spoon samplers (or equivalent). The samplers were advanced <br /> a minimum of 18 inches for each 5-foot interval. For samples selected for laboratory analysis, <br /> ' the liner was capped with Teflon tape and then with the appropriate end caps. The sample <br /> sleeves were labeled using a permanent marker and writing directly on the sample sleeve. <br /> The label included "sample ID (depth range)", date, and time. The sample was then double <br /> ' bagged and placed in an iced cooler. The sample information was then added to the chain-of- <br /> custody to accompany the samples to the laboratory. <br /> ' Soil samples were examined for lithologic identification in accordance with the Unified Soil <br /> Classification System and the Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils <br /> (Visual-Manual Procedure), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) <br /> ' Designation D2488 (ASTM 2000). The sample descriptions, observations, and any <br /> indications of contamination were recorded in the field on geologic logs and on field activity <br /> logs. A portable field photo-ionization detector(PID) was used to monitor for organic vapors <br /> and to measure headspace vapors from the soil samples. Logs of soil boring are presented in <br /> Appendix B. <br /> 2.2.2 Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction <br /> The groundwater monitoring wells were constructed using 2-inch diameter Schedule-40 PVC <br /> casing. The screened portion of the wells contained 0.010-inch milled-slots and were 10 foot <br /> in length. The "B" Zone well (CT-MW-8-87) was set with the screen bottom at <br /> approximately 87 feet bgs. The "C" Zone well (CT-MW-9-120) was set with screen bottom <br /> at approximately 120 feet bgs. An appropriately sized filter pack (Lonestar 02/12 sand) was <br /> ' placed in the annular space of the borehole adjacent to the screened interval. The filter pack <br /> was extended 2 foot above the screened interval to allow for settlement during well <br /> development. A 2-foot thick seal, consisting of hydrated bentonite '(3/8-inch chips), was <br /> ' placed above the filter pack in the annular space of the borehole. Grout slurry, consisting of <br /> neat cement, was placed above the bentonite seal in the annular space of the borehole to <br /> within 6 inches of the surface. <br /> ' Upon termination of the soil borings and prior to completion of the well installations, the <br /> SJCEHD grout inspector was notified for grouting approval. Borehole grouting was <br /> ' completed with a neat-cement grout mixture consisting of approximately 2.5-gallons water to <br /> each 47-pound bag of Type II-IV Portland cement. Grout was placed in the well annulus <br /> using a tremie pipe. Upon approval of the grout inspector, the grout was delivered by gravity <br /> ' Monitoring Well Installation <br /> and <br /> BioSparge Evaluation Report <br /> ' Prepared For:Sara Lee Bakery Group,Inc. 9 Prepared By:PSC lmi.wial Oumomcing,LP <br /> Sam Lee—Lincoln Street 2009_12_03-MW Installation&BioSpmge Evaluation Report(Rnal).doc Report Date:December 3,2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.