Laserfiche WebLink
16W C,eologicalTeckjucsl�c. N.O� Page 7 <br /> Sinclair&Thompson Property <br /> Soil Gas Survey Report <br /> r.. January 29,2007 <br /> © The purge test was performed in SG-4 (Figure 2). This sampling point was chosen <br /> because it is the closest to MW-1R and MW-4 and thus the most likely to produce the <br /> contaminants of concern. <br /> ❑ The purge volume of the sampling system included the internal volume of the tubing and <br /> the anular space around the probe tip. <br /> ❑ A step purge test of one, three, and seven purge volumes was performed on SG-4. The <br /> L. appropriate purge volume for sampling was selected based on the highest concentration <br /> for BTEX constituents detected during the purge volume tests. Benzene was not detected <br /> at any of the purge volume tests. The highest levels were detected during one purge <br /> volume and this was set as the default for the remaining soil gas sample points. <br /> Leak Test <br /> v A two-part leak test was performed on each of the borings: <br /> ❑ First, at each sample point an equipment vacuum test was performed after the drive rod <br /> has been driven to the desired sample depth. A vacuum was applied to the tubing before <br /> t„ the probe is opened and let stand for 30 seconds to confirm a tight seal. This test was <br /> successful at each location. The probe was opened and a 20-minute equilibrium period <br /> was performed at each boring. After equilibrium was reached each sample point was <br /> purged as described below. <br /> a Second, prior to collecting the sample, 1,1-Diflouroethane (1,1-DFA), a tracer, was <br /> applied to the ground surface around the drive rod, above the hydrated bentonite, and <br /> LO around the connection of the tubing to the syringe of each boring. <br /> Pur a/Sample Flow Rate <br /> LN The purge and sampling flow rate was between 20 to 150 ml/min. Thus avoiding or reducing <br /> the potential problem of stripping or ambient air dilution from occurring. A new plastic <br /> syringe was used at each borehole. <br /> L. <br /> Sample Tubing <br /> ' The polyethylene tubing was approximately 1/-inch diameter and new tubing was dedicated <br /> LO to each sample point. <br /> ' 3.2.3 Sample Handling Procedures <br /> A new syringe and polyethylene tubing were used on each of the soil gas samples collected <br /> during the soil gas investigation. The laboratory technician wore disposable gloves while <br /> i collecting syringe from the boring. The laboratory technician wore disposable gloves while <br /> LN analyzing the collected vapor samples. Gloves were changed with each sample collection. <br /> ' 3.2.4 Soil Gas Analytical Procedures <br /> +O TEG mobile laboratory and direct push service was selected for the soil gas investigation at <br /> the Site. TEG offers state-of-the-art active, passive, and flux chamber soil vapor surveys <br /> using EPA endorsed methods. MEG has completed more than 100,000 soil vapor locations at <br /> a variety of industrial and military sites across the United States and the world. TEG has <br /> designed and developed proprietary methods for Tier H landfill gas sampling, automated <br /> vapor monitoring at remediation sites, and tracer gas injection and testing. <br />