Laserfiche WebLink
La <br /> GeO&g&OI Technics Inc. Page 6 <br /> Sinclair&Thompson Property <br /> Soil Gas Survey Report <br /> LM January 29,2007 <br /> &W The sample locations were chosen at points as close as possible to the residence and the shop. <br /> These locations were between the buildings and the extents of excavation. The first location <br /> (SG-4) is located along the southeastern portion of the property that is closest to MW-1R and <br /> L, MW-4. MW-1R and MW-4 show the highest levels of contamination and the location of <br /> SG-4 was the most likely location to find vapor phase constituents. <br /> v 3.2.2 Sample Collection Procedures <br /> The active soil gas investigation (ASGI) was performed in accordance to the DTSC guidance <br /> document titled Advisory -Active Soil Gas Investigations, dated January 28, 2003. <br /> Field Conditions <br /> ° • Soil gas sampling was conducted during a period of dry weather, three days after a rain <br /> s. event. <br /> • The soil was dry and there was no moisture noted in the upper 9-feet of the subsurface. <br /> +O Soil Gas Borehole Sam le Depths <br /> • All borings were advanced to a depth of 9.0-feet bgs. The rods were pulled back, <br /> exposing the screened interval, until flow was measurable in the syringe. The recorded <br /> R- sampling depth indicates the top of the exposed screen interval. <br /> o SG-1 and the duplicate SG-1 were sampled at 8.5-feet bgs <br /> o SG-2, -4, and -5 were sampled at 9A-feet bgs (the rods were pulled back no more <br /> i. than 3-inches) <br /> o SG-3 was sampled at 8.0-feet bgs <br /> o SG-6 was sampled at 7.0-feet bgs <br /> Drilling Method <br /> A 9600 Series Power Probe, direct push drill rig, was used to advance rods to the selected <br /> sampling depth using a 135-foot pound hammer. <br /> The drive rod was driven to a depth of approximately 9-feet bgs and then pulled back <br /> L' approximately 2- to 24-inches to expose the inlets of the gas probe. A hydrated bentonite <br /> seal was placed around the drive rod at ground surface to prevent ambient air intrusion into <br /> the annual space of the borehole. Silicon tape was wrapped around the junction where the <br /> tubing entered the drive rod. <br /> A lag time of 20 minutes, or more, was allowed for equilibration of subsurface conditions <br /> after probe insertion to the sample depth. A sampling tube was attached to the probe tip to <br /> prevent infiltration. Silicon tape was wrapped around the junction where the tubing entered <br /> the drive rod. After sample collection, both the drive rod and the tubing were removed. Each <br /> #' boring used independent tubing and rods, eliminating the need to decors between sampling <br /> boreholes. <br /> Purge Volume Test <br /> To ensure that stagnant or ambient air is removed from the sampling system, a purge volume <br /> vs. contaminant concentration test was performed as described below: <br />