My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004599
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
290
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507835
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 12:41:15 PM
Creation date
3/5/2020 12:01:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0004599
RECORD_ID
PR0507835
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007793
FACILITY_NAME
SUPER STOP MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
290
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22309101
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
290 N MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C704rcalTecwalru. Page 8 <br /> Dual Phase Extraction Pilot Test Report <br /> Project No 662 2 <br /> February 22,2005 <br /> measurements were made in the surrounding wells using magnehelic gauges provided by <br /> Mako at periodic intervals Each wells' vacuum was measured by placing a cap over the well <br /> ' and attaching a gauge to the cap's orifice The field measurements conducted by GTI staff <br /> are included in Table 5, Appendix A <br /> After five minutes of operation the vacuum was strong enough to start extracting <br /> groundwater from EW-2 (the initial water depth of 27 ft indicated a water column of five feet <br /> in the well) The system valves were adjusted to maximize air flow and reduce as much <br /> ' water intake as possible The system was left in this configuration for three hours and <br /> vacuum readings taken from the surrounding wells Since the system was still slurping water <br /> with low vacuum applied, the stinger was lowered to extract groundwater and the vapor only <br /> ' extraction attempts terminated at 12 40 <br /> ' 4.2 Dual Phase Extraction from Well EW-2 <br /> December 6 <br /> ' The extraction hose (stinger) was lowered in well EW-2 to 32 feet (bottom of well) and dual <br /> phase extraction began at approximately 13 00 The stinger was left in this position for the <br /> remainder of the test <br /> GTI recorded the treatment trailer effluent discharge meter at regular intervals The meter <br /> readings were then used to calculate groundwater extraction rates that started out 18 gallons <br /> tper minute (gpm) on December 6t' The pumping data are included in Table 5, Appendix A <br /> At midnight Monday, and again at 8 00 on the morning of December 7b (Tuesday), the <br /> system was discovered to be extracting less than one gallon per minute By this time only <br /> 1100 gallons of water had been extracted and it was decided to begin extracting from the <br /> deep well EW-1 in conjunction with well EW-2 <br /> 4.3 Dual Phase Extraction from Wells EW-1 and EW-2 <br /> ' December 7 <br /> On December 7`�' at 1100, a second stinger hose was placed into well EW-1 The stinger was <br /> lowered to a position dust above the static water table (-27 feet) and vacuum applied to start <br /> ' slurping water The vacuum was pulling water out so quickly that the hose would repeatedly <br /> "deadhead" and lose vacuum The stinger was raised to about six feet above the water table <br /> (-20 feet bgs) By 12 00 the extraction rate had increased to approximately 2 6 gpm and the <br /> ' stinger was left in this position At 13 15 a water pick up was requested for American Valley <br /> to haul off the first load of accumulated water for disposal <br /> American Valley arrived at 14 20 and their first load of 3,400 gallons of water was removed <br /> At 16 00 the extraction rate had increased to 11 gpm and there was a concern that the <br /> extraction rate would exceed the holding tank capacity At 17 15 the extraction rate was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.