Laserfiche WebLink
Diamond Lumber-Lodi Quarterly Groundwaler Monitoring Page 5 <br /> elevation control for at least three points that lie on a common plane, in this case the groundwater <br /> . surface. The elevation control was obtained by subtracting the static water levels (measured from the <br /> top of well casings) from the elevations of the well heads (referenced to the City of Lodi Bench-Mark <br /> 710, Brass Cap at the southeast corner of Stockton Street and Locust Street: Elevation 49.74 feet). <br /> It should be noted that the groundwater elevations varied by only a few tenths of feet. Based on <br /> calculations using data collected during the April sampling event, the trend of the groundwater <br /> gradient was estimated to be N27.5°E, with a nearly horizontal gradient. Trend refers to the bearing <br /> of a line on a horizontal plane. Bearing is measured in degrees east or west from north or south. <br /> It should be noted that because the groundwater gradient is extremely flat (the difference in static <br /> groundwater elevations between the highest and lowest point is approximately 0.15 feet) it was <br /> difficult to determine the bearing. Our calculations indicate that the gradient is from S27.50W to <br /> N27.5°E. Because the Mokelumne River is located north of the Diamond Lumber facility, it was <br /> assumed that the natural groundwater gradient would mimic the surface water flow direction, an <br /> assumption which is qualified by our calculations. <br /> SRK is currently gathering subsurface groundwater information from private, municipal and irrigation <br /> wells Iocated within 2,000 feet of the site, pursuant to the request of the San Joaquin County <br /> PHS/EHD (Correspondence dated September 14, 1992). This information was not available at the <br /> time of this report, and will be provided as an addendum to this quarterly monitoring report upon <br /> receipt. Recent communication with Mr. F. Biehler (City of Lodi) indicates that a generally <br /> horizontal groundwater table with minor local variations exists in this area. Mr. Biehler is forwarding <br /> i further information which will be included in forthcoming monitoring reports, <br /> i5.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> Three additional casing volumes were purged from well SRK-MW1 and SRK-MW3 before analytical <br /> samples were collected. Monitoring well SRK-MW2 was bailed dry after one casing volume was <br /> removed. This well was allowed to recharge for approximately one hour, however, there was not a <br /> sufficient volume of water in the well to sample. The analytical groundwater samples were collected <br /> after the pH, temperature, and conductivity had stabilized. "Stabilized" was defined as three <br /> consecutive readings within 15% of one another. Copies of the Field Groundwater Purging/Sampling <br /> Logs are provided in Appendix A. Copies of the Geologic Logs and Monitoring Well Construction <br /> Diagrams are provided in Appendix B. <br /> Dedicated pre-cleaned tellon bailers and nylon rope were used to retrieve the water samples. The <br /> water samples were carefully poured into laboratory grade sample containers equipped with teflon <br /> lined lids, then placed in an iced cooler. The analytical parameters include volatile hydrocarbons (by <br /> EPA 8015M, GC/FID Purge & Trap), benzene, toluene, ethlybenzene, and xylene (BTEX) <br /> i <br /> (Aromatics by EPA 60218020, GC/PID Purge & Trap); and total lead (EPA Method 239.2 GFAA). <br /> The analytical groundwater samples were placed in a cooler containing additional frozen blue ice <br /> packets and shipped following strict chain-of-custody procedures to a California certified laboratory <br /> (ACZ Laboratories) for analysis. <br />�� T` `•W ., Steffen Robertson and Kirsten <br /> 3zw..1 \3-oLr I Y.LM <br />