SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

Pagel of 2 Mike Infurna [EH] From: Robert Marty [rmarty@advgeoenv.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 8:31 AM To: Mike Infurna [EH] Subject: RE: Main Street Property No billing issues. Already took care of billing for the work plan. Provided both parties with the identical costs for completion of the approved work. Once I get the Purchase Order from the City, 1 will send you a cover letter with the permit costs indicating that the City will be executing the work plan submitted on behalf of Main Street Investments. Since both are named on the "approvals" and all regulatory correspondence, it should not be a problem. One good thing about the City: I'm working with them so we do not have to get an encroachment perniit. Since it is City property, we should not need an encroachment. I'll let Sharla Hardy handle the legalities of that one. Anyway, the sun came up this morning. I guess that is a good thing. Thanks, Robert E. Marty, R.E.A. I Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Stockton • Santa Rosa • Monterey • Brea 1-800-511-9300 rmarty@advgeoenv.com www.advgeoenv.com This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure or distribution of this email/fax is prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by email/fax and destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message. From: Mike Infurna [EH] [ma iIto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 8:22 AM To: rmarty@advgeoenv.com Subject: RE: Main Street Property Although I'm pleased (again) that this site appears to be progressing, I'm not sure a WP submitted for one RP and worked upon by the other RP is ok. Is the billing party going to be a problem? From: Robert Marty [mai Ito:rmarty@advgeoenv.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:46 PM To: Mike Infurna [EH] Subject: Main Street Property 1/21/2009