My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003810
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOOMIS
>
2969
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545428
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2020 7:15:43 PM
Creation date
3/9/2020 10:34:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003810
RECORD_ID
PR0545428
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005487
FACILITY_NAME
MARCIS DIESEL SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
2969
STREET_NAME
LOOMIS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2969 LOOMIS RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
G eolagical7'eclxlcs INC. <br /> Soil&Groundwater Investigation Report Page 5 <br /> Marci Property <br /> Project No. 701.2 <br /> July 24,2002 <br /> MW-104bk <br /> V • <br /> Laboratory samples were obtained from 55 an�85 feet bgs. The 55 feet bgs sample <br /> contained 1300 mg/kg TPH-D and 801 jig/kg Xylene. The 85 feet bgs sample did <br /> not contain contaminant concentrations above the laboratory reporting limits. <br /> MW-106 <br /> f Laboratory samples were obtained from 85 and 95 feet bgs. Neither sample <br /> contained contaminant concentrations above the laboratory reporting limits. <br /> �. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on our interpretation of the data collected over the course of this subsurface <br /> investigation, GTI has reached several conclusions. These conclusions are based on the <br /> premise that the data considered, although incomplete, are representative of actual site <br /> conditions. We acknowledge that there may be undiscovered conditions, which would upon <br /> their consideration, change our interpretation and thus our conclusions. <br /> Our recommendations are based on our knowledge of site conditions, and on the state and <br /> limitations of subsurface investigative technology. <br /> 5.1 Conclusions <br /> Geological Technics Inc. makes the following conclusions. <br /> 1. Geology: <br /> 0 The geology of the site consists primarily of alternating layers, lenses and <br /> +- interstratified beds of clays, silts and sands. Units containing gravels are less <br /> frequent. See Appendix B - Boring Logs and Figures 3 & 5 - Cross-Sections for <br /> more information. Figures 3 & 5 provide a geologic interpretation of the units <br /> observed in the borehole drill logs. <br /> • Figure 3: Geologic Cross-Section A-A' illustrates the subsurface from the southwest <br /> to northeast sections of the subject area.,'The interpretation incorporates sub-classes <br /> such as gravelly clay and silty clay which are consolidated into the general category <br /> of clays. There is little correlation in lithologic units between borings. Boring MW- <br /> 3 (logged by Wm. Hunter & Associates) contains significantly more clay than the <br /> other boreholes. <br /> • Figure 5: Geologic Cross-Section B-B' illustrates the subsurface from the northwest <br /> to southeast sections of the subject area. There is little correlation in lithologic units <br /> between borings as in Cross-Section A —A'. Boring MW-2 (logged by Wm. Hunter <br /> & Associates) contains significantly more clay than the other boreholes. Together <br /> with the MW-3 data this suggests that contamination would be less likely to migrate <br /> eastward across the site. <br /> 2. Contaminant Distribution <br /> Figures 4 and 6 illustrate the soil and groundwater contaminant distribution as <br /> superimposed on cross sections A - A' and B --- B'.' The groundwater data from the June 7, <br /> ` 2002, monitoring event are presented in the diagrams adjacent to the respective well's <br /> screened interval. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.