Laserfiche WebLink
Crealogkal uchda I/M Page 2 <br /> Groundwater Momtonng Report <br /> Project No 770 2 <br /> November 8,2004 <br /> ' A site conceptual model (SCM) report dated August 23, 2004 was submitted to San Joaquin <br /> County Public Health Services/Environmental Health Divisions (SJC PHS/EHD) for <br /> approval Additional recommendations regarding the site will be forthcoming from GTI <br /> pending comments from the SJC PHS/EHD on the site conceptual model <br /> ' 1,0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 1,1 Hydrogeology of Site <br />' The site exhibits a primarily silty/clayey geology with minor sand layers/lenses, pebbles, <br /> black organics and iron staining occasionally present The groundwater monitoring schedule <br /> was modified to include monthly depth to groundwater measurements in 2002 This was <br /> necessary to better define the gradients that have varied greatly in the past <br /> 8 V 1113®'0V <br /> On June 7, 2004, the water table well groundwater elevation averaged -40 P4 feet mean sea <br /> level (MSL) For the August 19, 2004, event the water table well groundwater elevation <br /> averaged —43 09 feet MSL A net decrease of 2 25 feet MSL was recorded between the June <br /> and August 2004 sounding events Groundwater gradient calculations indicate that the flow <br /> M in the water table wells was S38°E with a slope of 0 002 ft/ft on August 19, 2004 while the <br /> deeper aquifer gradient was S54°E with a slope of 0 002 ft/ft <br /> Groundwater elevation and gradient data are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, Appendix A <br /> The water table and deep well gradient directions are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, <br /> respectively, for the August 2004 event <br /> The historical water table gradients are illustrated in Figure 4 & 5 Groundwater Gradient <br /> Rose Diagrams for Water Table and Deep Wells, respectively The site's shallow aquifer <br /> displays highly variable shifts in groundwater direction It is noted that groundwater <br /> direction has been predominantly to the southeast since additional wells were installed in <br /> May 2002 The deeper aquifer flow had been consistently to the east for the previous seven <br />' sounding events But on April 28 and May 23, 2003, the gradient reversed 180' from an <br /> easterly direction to _a westerly direction The direction reversed again to_the east for the <br /> remainder of the sounding events <br /> Vertical Groundwater Gradients <br /> Under vertical groundwater flow conditions, the water level in a monitoring well is a function <br /> of the length of the well screen and its depth or vertical position in the aquifer As with <br /> horizontal flow conditions, the diameter of the well or piezometer is immaterial <br />' The following procedure is used to calculate vertical groundwater gradient <br />