Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> Site Closure Summary <br /> Fuller Mobile Home Park August 8, 1997 <br /> I 365 E. Louise Avenue, Lathrop, California Page. 6 <br /> domestic well is identified within the 2,000 ft radius to the northwest of the site which is <br /> also up gradient (Appendix C) <br /> The conclusion of that report indicates there are no.receptors identified within a 2,000 <br /> foot radii, that would be adversely impacted or cause risk to human health <br /> 1 <br /> i8.0 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminates <br />' The petroleum hydrocarbon contaminates found in both soil and groundwater at this site <br /> are Gasoline, Diesel, Benzene, Ethyl Benzene, Toluene and Xylenes The only analyte of <br /> concern appears to be the elevated levels of Benzene in the first groundwater aquifer The <br />' other analytes are below the levels of concern as identified in the "Technical Memorandum <br /> to Staff," dated May 5, 1995 by Jon B Marshall entitled, 'Beneficial Use - Protective <br /> Water Quality Limited for Components of Petroleum -Based Fuels" (Appendix E) <br /> Soil and groundwater contamination has been limited primarily to the areas of bonngs B 1 <br /> through B4 and Monitoring Wells MW-1, 2 and 3 (Figure 2), respectively, since late 1993 <br /> Since January 1995, the period of the highest concentrations of petroleum, there has been <br /> a decline or regression of the Benzene analyte as well as the other analytes as identified by <br /> the Groundwater Tabular Data presented in the tables of this report Further, the <br /> Benzene Regression Chart incorporates the stability and regression of Benzene over time <br /> in Monitoring Wells MW-1, 2 and 3 (Appendix F) <br />' The regression is an occurrence of natural attenuation over time No Best Available <br /> Technology (BAT) has been employed as of this date <br /> 1 <br />' 9.0 Best Available Technologies <br /> With regards to BAT applications at this site, much discussion has been had about various <br /> technologies such as Groundwater Pump and Treat Systems, Air Sparging and Soil Gas <br /> Vapor Extraction Systems and of course, re-excavation of the secondary source <br />' Re-excavation or over excavation may have been appropriate at the time of tank removal <br /> However, now subsurface construction such as storm drains, sewer line and construction <br /> of a storm drain reservoir have occurred making re-excavation far to costly Further, this <br /> activity would require excavation on another individuals property, (Estimated Cost <br /> $51,00000) <br />