Laserfiche WebLink
Corrective Action Plan <br /> 2.2 Hydrogeologic Characteristics <br /> ' The groundwater elevation at the site has fluctuated from more than 25 feet below ground surface <br /> (bgs) in 1991 (at the height of the drought period)to less than 15 feet bgs during the most recent <br /> ' monitoring events in early 1997. The direction of groundwater flow over this period has covered <br /> an approximate 140 degree range from approximately north 60 degrees west to north 80 degrees <br /> east. The water table beneath the site has been relatively flat with a gradient ranging from 0.0005 <br /> ' to 0.012 (a median gradient of less than 0.003). <br /> The soil at the site has been logged by different geologists (Greg Drilling for Blymer Engineers <br /> t Inc. [Blymer]; Steffen Robertson and Kirsten [SRK]; and Park Environmental Corporation <br /> [Park]) during each phase of the site investigation involving monitoring well installations. OST <br /> believes that the considerable variations in the type and size of the soil described in the logs <br /> ' represent interpretive differences rather than lateral variation in the soil. According to the logs <br /> provided by Blymer and by Park,the soil consists of relatively thick(>10 feet) layers of fine sand <br /> (which SRK calls sandy clay) interbedded with thinner (<5 feet) layers of clay or silt. The <br /> ' drilling logs for all monitoring wells are presented in Appendix A. Because of the variations in <br /> well logging and the limited area of concern, the construction of geologic cross-sections was not <br /> considered particularly useful or practical. Although the site was not subjected to aquifer pump <br /> ' testing or soil vapor extraction treatability testing, both groundwater extraction and soil vapor <br /> extraction (SVE) are considered viable. The rationale for these assumptions are presented in a <br /> later section of this CAP. <br /> 3.0 BACKGROUND SUMMARY <br /> Both soil and groundwater at this facility have been impacted by excessive concentrations of <br /> ' petroleum hydrocarbons, specifically gasoline. The background summary has been derived from <br /> several phases of site investigation and groundwater monitoring conducted between 1988 to the <br /> present by three environmental consulting firms, Blymer, SRK, and Park. A comprehensive <br /> ' review of the following technical reports along with OST's more than twelve years experience <br /> in soil and groundwater remediation provide the basis for the CAP. <br /> ' Environmental Site Assessment and Structural Inspection, 1989, by Blymer <br /> • Update Information, 1990, by Blymer <br /> • Phase II Environmental Audit, December 1991, by SRK, <br /> ' Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, July 1992, by SRK <br /> • Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, October 1992, by SRK <br /> • Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, April 1993, by SRK <br /> ' Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, January 1994, by SRK <br /> • Soil and Water investigation Work Plan, November 1994, Park <br /> • Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, November 1994, by Park <br /> • Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, June 1995, by Park <br /> 701-1-2.cap OST <br /> Page 3 <br />