Laserfiche WebLink
Corrective Action Plan <br /> • Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, October 1995, by Park <br /> • Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, December 1995, by Park <br /> ' Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, February 1996, by Park <br /> • Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, April 1996, by Park <br /> ' a Well Construction Report and Groundwater Monitoring Report, August 1996, by Park <br /> • Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring, October 1996, by Park <br /> Although there are numerous and important inconsistencies in some of the documents cited <br /> above, including switching of well identification designations and incorrect reporting of well <br /> data, particularly in the data reported by Blymer, a careful review of all of the available <br /> documentation has given OST a comprehensive and, what we consider accurate, understanding <br /> of the site history and subsurface conditions with respect to gasoline-impacted soil and <br /> groundwater. <br /> The following paragraphs summarize DST's comprehension as to the relevant history of the site <br /> and its present condition with respect to the presence of gasoline contaminants. <br /> ' One 500-gallon gasoline underground storage tank (UST) was removed from the property in <br /> 1985. Reportedly,at the time of the UST removal, an unknown amount of hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> ' soil was excavated and disposed. However,the amount or disposition of this soil was apparently <br /> undocumented. <br /> The location of the former UST has been reported at different locations throughout the history <br /> of successive investigations. Based upon the earliest, and what OST believes to be the most <br /> ' accurate diagram of the tank location by Blymer, we believe with reasonable certainty that the <br /> location of the former UST was immediately adjacent to and southeast of the soil boring <br /> designated as B-9. In addition, OST agrees with Park's interpretation that the present <br /> ' monitoring well, BEI-MW3, might have been drilled within the boundary of the former UST <br /> backfill area as illustrated on the Site Map, Figure 2. A copy of the Blymer sketch diagram upon <br /> which the tank location is based is included in Appendix B. <br /> ' Subsequent phases of site investigation involving groundwater monitoring well installations were <br /> conducted on three occasions: <br /> ' In December 1989, Blymer installed three monitoring wells,presently designated as BEI-MW I, <br /> BEI-MW2,and BEI-MW3. Analyses of soil samples collected during the drilling of MW-2 (now <br /> ' designated BEI-MW2) and MW-3 (now designated BEI-MW 1) detected no significant <br /> concentrations of either Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) or BTEX in the <br /> samples collected at 5 and 10 feet bgs; however, both wells contained moderate concentrations <br /> ' of TPHg (270 millgrams per kilogram [mg/kg] and 96 mg/kg, respectively) at 15 feet bgs. BEI- <br /> MW2 also contained detected TPHg concentrations of 130 mg/kg at 20 feet bgs. Analytical <br /> results of all soil sampling events are summarized in Table 1. <br /> OST <br /> 705-1-2.cap Page 4 <br />