Laserfiche WebLink
26 August 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 03-1025 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> SOIL AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> On 19 August 2003, an AGE representative met Mr. Michael Infurna of the SJCEHD at the site for <br /> approval of the requested sampling locations (Figure 2). Following SJCEHD approval, nine soil <br /> samples (LL-1 through LL-3, 1313-4, LL-5 through LL-8, ST-9) were collected at the specified <br /> locations; sample ST-9 was angled at approximately 25 degrees to reach the area directly below the <br /> septic tank. <br /> Sample ST-9 was collected at a depth of 13 to 15 feet below surface grade (bsg); samples LL-1 <br /> through LL-3, LL-5 through LL-8 and DB-4 were collected at 4 to 6 feet bsg. Soil samples were <br /> collected using a Geoprobe soil sampling assembly loaded with four pre-cleaned 1.125-inch by <br /> 6-inch brass sleeves. Two sleeves of each soil sample were preserved by covering both ends of the <br /> brass sleeve with Teflon sheets, capping, and sealing with tape. <br /> All samples were properly labeled,placed in an appropriate,chilled container and transported under <br /> chain-of-custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratory,a State of California Department of Health <br /> Services (DHS)-certified laboratory. The samples were analyzed for: <br /> • Carbon Chain Full Scan(C-6 through C-40) in accordance with EPA Method 8015M; <br /> • Total oil and grease and total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) in accordance <br /> with EPA Method 418.1; <br /> • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), reporting all peaks in accordance with EPA Method <br /> 826013; and <br /> • pH in accordance with EPA Method 150.1. <br /> FIELD OBSERVATIONS <br /> The soil samples collected from D13-4 and LL-7 had a detectable,unidentified odor;the odor did not <br /> resemble petroleum-based contaminants,but did resemble the contents previously inside the septic <br /> tank before the contents were pumped out on 03 June 2003. The presence of the odor and it's non- <br /> petroleum nature-was confirmed by a Cal Tech representative. <br /> LABORATORY RESULTS <br /> None of the target analytes were reported at concentrations above the detection limits. Soil sample <br /> pH measurements ranged from 6.94 to 8.93.Copies ofthe laboratory report with QA/QC data(CTEL <br /> Project No: CT214-0308083) and chain-of-custody form are included in Appendix A. <br />