Laserfiche WebLink
Quarte <br /> ly <br /> BeaconrstationnNo. 3- 492, Manteca, California <br /> January 31, 1989 <br /> AGS 86102-3 <br /> subjective analysis. The sFmples were collected by lowering <br /> approximately half the leng'_h of a clean Teflon bailer past the <br /> interface. The bailer was than retrieved and the water sample <br /> examined of hyfor f:-ee product <br /> evidence , emulsion, sheen, or other subjective <br /> drocarbon contamination. Approximately 0,25-inch <br /> of .free product was present in well mx-l. No free <br /> sheen, or emulsion was noted in samples from wells MW-2uor�MW-3. <br /> Cumulative results of these and previous subjective analyses are <br /> summarized in Table 1. <br /> f <br /> Ground-water mo:iitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3 were purged prior to <br /> obtaining ground-water esmples for laboratory analysis with an <br /> electric submersible pump. Because free product gas observed in <br /> well MW-1, the well was not purged or sampled. <br /> gallons of ground water were purged from well MW-2, and <br /> approximately 77 gallo,ls were purged from well WK-3. <br /> water was temporarily stored onsite in 55-gallon The purge <br /> Transportation drums, pend,ir.q removal to BeaconnsBrefinerytinf <br /> Hanford, California, and subsequent treatment in a wastewater <br /> tewater <br /> '' Recovery to the wells was relatively <br /> had recovered to static levels S'. rapid. collo After ground water <br /> lowering a clean Teflon bailer pies were collected by <br /> Point a past thy: air-water interface to a <br /> pproxima .ely 3 feet below the interface. The water was <br /> then transferZe <br /> viai.0 laboratory-cleaned, 40-milliliter glass <br /> ls. Concentrated hydrochloric acid was added as a <br /> preservative. A Chain of Custody Record was initiated by the <br /> field geologist ani accompanied the samples to Applied <br /> GeoSystems' analytical laboratory in Fremont, California. A copy <br /> of that record .is <br /> attached to this letter report. <br /> Tree ground-water samples were analyzed for total <br /> Petrole <br /> Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline by modified Envi.ronmentalum <br /> Protection Agency (FPA) Method 8015 and the volatile hydrocarbon <br /> constitztents benzene, ethylbanzene, toluene, and total x}lene <br /> isomers <br /> (SETX) by EPA Method 602. Applied Ceosystema' laboratory <br /> is certified by the S•rate of California ed perforin these <br /> analyses. Copies of . laboratory Analysis Reports are attached <br /> to this .letter report. <br /> ,Th <br /> e-_results of the laboratory analyses, summarized in Table 2 <br /> indicate that the concentrations of W.TX and TPH in samples from <br /> wells MW--2 and MW-3 have decrer :ed sgnificaritly. with the <br /> exception of the benzene concentration in the sample from well <br /> MW-2, the contaminant concentrations were below the actiDn levels <br /> 2 <br /> M <br /> Y . <br />