Laserfiche WebLink
(I <br /> I <br /> September 14, 1988 <br /> r AGS Job No. 86102-3 <br /> Page 2 <br /> previous sampling events. The data indicate that the ground- <br /> water surface has dropped an average of 2.01 feet compared to the <br /> last measurement. <br /> 61N <br /> After the initial water-level measurements were taken, samples of <br /> ground water from the air-fluid interface were collected for <br /> subjective analysis by lowering approximately half the length of <br /> a clean Teflon bailer past the interface. The bailer was then <br /> retrieved and the water sample examined for floating product, <br /> �q emulsion, sheen, or other subjective evidence of hydrocarbon <br /> contamination. No floating product or emulsion was noted in <br /> samples from the monitoring wells, although a slight product <br /> sheen was noted in well Mw-1. Cumulative results of these and <br /> previous subjective analyses are summarized in Table 1. <br /> Ground-water monitoring wells Mw-1, MW-2, and Mw-3 were purged <br /> prior to sampling with an electric submersible pump. <br /> Approximately 330 gallons of ground water were pumped from each <br /> well. The water was pumped into 55-gallon DOT drums which were <br /> temporarily stored on the site. The purged water was <br /> subsequently removed from the drums, hauled to Beacon's refinery <br /> in Hanford, California, and treated in a waste-water separator. <br /> Recovery in the wells was relatively rapid. After ground water <br /> was allowed to recover to static levels, samples were collected <br /> by lowering the top of a clean Teflon bailer through the air- <br /> water interface to a point approximately 3 feet below the <br /> Einterface. The water was then transferred to laboratory-cleaned, <br /> C C!I liliter glass volatile organic analysis vials. <br /> Concentrated hydrochloric acid was added as a preservative. A <br /> Chain of Custody Record was initiated by the field geologist and <br /> accompanied the samples to Applied GeoSystems' analytical <br /> laboratory in Fremont, California. A copy of that record is <br /> attached .to this,-letter report. <br /> The ground-water samples were analyzed for total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TPH) by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) <br /> Method 8015 (modified for gasoline) and the volatile hydrocarbon <br /> constituents benzene; ethylbenzene, toluene, and total xylene <br /> ].sobers (BETX) by EPA Method 602. Applied GeoSystems' laboratory <br /> is certified by the State of California for these analyses. <br /> Ccpies of the laboratory Analysis Reports are attached to this <br /> letter report. <br /> -- - ; -- The-results-of-the- analyses f summarized-inTable 2, indicate-that --- - -- _---- -- -- --- <br /> the concentration of benzene in ground-water samples collected <br /> J from monitoring wells Mw-1, MW-2, and Mw-3 exceeded .the maximum <br /> levels for drinking water recommended by the California <br /> Department of Health Services (DHS) . The concentration of <br /> toluene and total xylene isomers in the sample collected from <br /> .4ppiiea� GeoSYSAMs <br />