Laserfiche WebLink
EOM No G.BROWN JR. <br /> -# GOVERNOR <br /> CAL/IOaYIA MATTHEW ROORIOUEZ <br /> Water Boards SECRETARY TAL <br /> E NViRONMENTAL vgOTE{TION <br /> State Water Resources Control Board <br /> OCT 2 1 1013 <br /> October 2013 <br /> `GGA c <br /> Adrienne Ellsaesser tier y <br /> San Joaquin Count <br /> Environmental Health Department (County) <br /> 600 E. Main Street <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> REVIEW SUMMARY REPORT—CLOSURE (SECOND REVIEW) FOR CLAIM NUMBER <br /> 18428; CALIFORNIA STOP, 2224 MANTHEY ROAD, STOCKTON, CA: <br /> The UST Cleanup Fund (Fund) has completed our Review Summary Report of County Case <br /> No. 1317. <br /> The Review Summary Report process, authorized in Health and Safety Code (HSC) section <br /> 25299.39.2, provides that if the Fund Manager determines the case warrants closure then a <br /> copy of a review summary report will be provided to the regulatory agency for comment. Once <br /> the Fund Manager determines that the case warrants closure, the regulatory agency is <br /> precluded from issuing a corrective action directive or enforcing an existing directive, with <br /> limited exceptions as specified in HSC 25299.39.2, subdivision (a)(4). A copy of HSC <br /> 25299.39.2 can be found at leginfo.ca.gov. <br /> The enclosed draft review summary report which determines that closure is appropriate, "Draft <br /> Review Summary Report—Closure," is being provided to you as a courtesy draft for a 45-day <br /> review period before it is signed by the Fund Manager. <br /> In the event your agency does not concur with the determination in the Draft Review Summary <br /> Report-Closure, you have an opportunity within the next 45 days to provide compelling <br /> information: (1) that would show the case does not meet closure criteria [UST Low Threat <br /> Closure Policy or the decisional framework for closure under Resolution 92-49] or (2) that a <br /> statutory exception exists and there should not be a stay of regulatory directives. <br /> After reviewing your comments, the Fund Manager may either change the recommendation or, <br /> lacking compelling reasons described above and in the HSC, sign the "Review Summary <br /> Report—Closure" and send copies to you and applicable claimants after 45 days from the date of <br /> this letter. Once the Fund Manager signs the "Review Summary Report—Closure," the regulatory <br /> agency is precluded from issuing a corrective action directive or enforcing an existing directive, <br /> unless an exception applies. <br /> In the event that your agency concurs with the determination, your agency may submit a letter <br /> or e-mail to the Cleanup Fund Manager, within 45-days of the date of this letter, stating that your <br /> agency will public notice the case for closure within 3 months and, pending public comments, <br /> order closure activities within 6 months of the date of this letter. <br /> Lacking such a commitment from your agency, the Fund Manager will recommend case closure <br /> to the State Water Board and public notice the draft proposed closure order. If the State Water <br /> Board determines that case closure is appropriate, it will order case closure for the site and <br /> issue the uniform closure letter after closure activities have been completed. <br /> FELICIA MARCUS,CHAIR I THOMAS HOWARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR <br /> 1001 1 Street,Sacramento,CA 95814 1 Mailing Address:P.O.Box 100,Sacramento,Ca 95812-0100 1 www.waterboards.ca.gov <br /> 161 RECYCLED PARER <br />