Laserfiche WebLink
FOURTH QUARTER, 2002 <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT <br /> AND ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT REPORT <br /> JAMAR OIL DISTRIBUTION <br /> MARCH 2003 <br /> In HP-2, soil samples were collected from a clayey silt with minor sand layer at 15-feet bgs, from <br /> a silty clay layer at 30-feet bgs, and from a clayey silt layer at 45-feet bgs In HP-3, soil samples <br /> were collected from a silt layer at 25-feet bgs, from a clayey silt layer at 42-feet bgs, and from a <br /> sandy silt layer at 52 5-feet bgs The soil sample htholognes are shown on the soil boring logs <br /> which are included as Appendix D <br /> Two groundwater samples were collected from each geoprobe boring for laboratory analysis <br /> Based on an analysis of the CPT boring logs, it was determined that there were two potentially <br /> distinct groundwater levels in each of the geoprobe boring locations Groundwater samples were <br /> taken from approximately 65-feet bgs and 100-feet bgs in all three geoprobe borings The sample <br /> for 1HP-1 at 65-feet was taken from the adjacent monitoring well MW-4 which is screened at that <br /> interval and where the depth to water was 65-feet bgs The sample from HP-3 at 65-feet was <br /> taken more than 12 hours after the geoprobe was installed because of a lack of water in the hole <br /> The water levels for each of the bongs are shown on the soil boring logs which are included as <br /> Appendix D All of the geoprobe borings were abandoned by filling the bonngs to the surface <br /> with cement grout, using a trenume pipe, according to County regulations and permit <br /> requirements <br /> Soil Sampling and Analysis <br /> The soil samples were collected with 1 5-inch diameter hollow stem rods fitted with a large bore <br /> soil sampling assembly loaded with acetate sleeves The samples were transported using proper <br /> sample handling and COC protocol established by the USEPA The samples were labeled with <br /> the date, time, identifying boring number, and depth, stored in a cooler at 4° Centigrade or less, <br /> and transported to a state certified laboratory under completed COC documentation <br /> The soil samples were analyzed for TPH G and TPH D using EPA Method 8015 Modified and for <br /> BTEX, 1,2-DCA, EDB and the fuel oxygenates DIPE,ETBE, MTBE, TAME, and TBA using <br /> EPA Method 8260B The analyses were conducted by SunStar Laboratories Inc , a California <br /> State certified laboratory, in accordance with state guidelines and EPA protocol <br /> Groundwater Sampling and Analysis <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from each geoprobe using a Hydropunch sampler and <br /> polypropylene tubing The samples were placed into laboratory prepared containers, using proper <br /> sample handling and chain-of-custody (COC) protocol established by the USEPA The samples <br /> were labeled with the date, tune,identifying geoprobe number, and depth, stored in a cooler at 4° <br /> Centigrade or less, and transported to a state certified laboratory under completed COC <br /> . documentation <br /> 7 <br />