Laserfiche WebLink
Page 13 of 14 <br /> P <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com].. <br /> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 1:17 PM <br /> To: Chevlen, Benjamin <br /> Subject:J6 #5886 <br /> Ben, <br /> er <br /> Could you address the following for me <br /> please: <br /> 1 well construction specs for the "UST- <br /> MW" please. ie: date installed, construction <br /> specs (size & material of casing, screened <br /> interval and size, sand, seal, etc. Also, <br /> your/COP intentions for this well if NFA <br /> granted. destroy it? leave it? if so, why? <br /> ^ Stantec does not have precise details <br /> --,regarding the construction specs for well <br /> UST-MW. In ERI's 12/28/99 CAP, the well <br /> was proposed to be 4 inches in diameter <br /> and installed to a depth of 12 feet (no <br /> details regarding screen, filter pack, seal, <br /> casing material, etc. provided). In ERI's <br /> 7/20/00 quarterly report, ERI stated "The <br /> following tasks were performed during the <br /> second quarter 2000... in general <br /> accordance with the CAP (ERI, December <br /> 28, 1999) and without a County well <br /> installation permit, ERI installed the UST <br /> cavity well at the site." Stantec cannot <br /> locate any report prepared specifically to <br /> document the installation of the UST cavity <br /> well. <br /> If NFA is granted, ConocoPhillips would <br /> destroy the well, unless the property ovaner <br /> requested ownership and responsibility of <br /> the well be transferred to them. <br /> 2- your NFAR history STOPS at "During <br /> third quarter 2001......" What has been <br /> done on site since end of 2001 to <br /> present.???? In Section 2.7 Stantec <br /> omitted including the installation of the <br /> ozone sparge system (discussed with <br /> insufficient detail in Section 2.5). In <br /> January 2002, ERI oversaw the installation <br /> of sparge wells AS-1 through AS-5, AS- <br /> 6S/D, AS-7, AS-B, AS-9S/D and AS-10 <br /> 3/14/2011 <br />