Laserfiche WebLink
rage �l <br /> Stantec <br /> To: Chevlen, Benjamin <br /> Subject: RE: 76 Station No. 5886 - Contact information for offsite property owner <br /> ok.. <br /> I happen to know David and Scott and their phone number...no problem. <br /> first, just WHO said/refused access? Is the MW-9 cluster on City/public <br /> property or private? <br /> I really don't have time to stop what I'm doing for the field work plans Monday <br /> and next week so I'll need you to verify some of these points. <br /> 1-Exactly what parcel is the MW-9 complex on.? get me the APN. <br /> 2- do you now have a signed access agreement for this well complex if it's <br /> NOT on Public/City land? <br /> 3- the name of the person denying access and when. <br /> 4- is it conceivable that MW-11 may not have to be installed and only soil <br /> vapor issues in this area need to be addressed? <br /> get back to me with the info on MW-9 date of installation, our permit #, and <br /> exactly who's property it's on. If is truly is the City's, then there should be an <br /> open/existin Revocable Permit and bond on file with the City and copies in <br /> your file. <br /> if there's a signed access agreement by a private entity for MW-9, then I need <br /> to see who signed it and what conditions for entry are listed. <br /> and lastly, is this site qualified for NFA if the gw and soil/vapor data in MW-9 <br /> area is current and low/ND? <br /> Mr. Rishwan assured me he will put this concern on the front burner now that I <br /> have become involved. I need the confidence to support that valid, favorable <br /> data collected from the MW-9 area in the near future could support conclusions <br /> that this site is qualified for NFA and these few 'visits' will be close to the last <br /> times we will need to be using this well and accessing this area. <br /> I <br /> From: Chevlen, Benjamin [mailto:Benjamin.Chevlen@stantec.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 2:32 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: 76 Station No. 5886 - Contact information for offsite property owner <br /> Mike -Thanks for getting back to me. The ftp link below contains copies of the original work <br /> plan proposing the installation of one set of nested wells and performing a hydrogen peroxide <br /> injection bench scale test, as well as a subsequent work plan proposing groundwater batch <br /> extraction events (utilizing the MW-9 well cluster) in lieu of performing the bench scale test. <br /> ftp:Al 217150.631;5246320@ftpt�stantec.com <br /> I have recently taken over management of the site, and my understanding is that the offsite property <br /> 1/27/2010 <br />