Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION REPORT L INVESTIGATION REPORT <br /> Unocal Service Station No 5886 <br /> n No 5886 <br /> 2701 West March Lane L <br /> ine <br /> Stockton,California <br /> Delta Project No D095-066 195-066 <br /> ' Page 6 <br /> 4 1 4 Unauthorized Release Reports removal of the crushed rock and backfill, the canopy areas were sampled Five soil <br /> On August 8, 1995, Unocal submitted an Underground Storage Tank Unauthorized Release (Leak) ollected from each of the canopy areas and submitted to Sequoia for chemical analyses <br /> ' Contamination Site Report (URR, form HSC 05) to the SJCEHD This report was submitted following <br /> Itlons and chemical analyses requested were performed at the direction of SJCEHD Soil <br /> verbal notification to SJCEHD on August 4, 1995 At SJCEHD's request, Delta prepared and submitted <br /> )llected from the base of each sidewall and the base of each excavation The location of <br /> an additional Unauthorized Release Report dated August 24, 1995 <br /> are presented in Figure 4, Canopy Footing Soil Sample Locations <br /> ' 4 2 Canopy Footing Backfilling. Removal of Drain Rock, and Soil Sampling iopy Footing Soil Sample Analytical Results <br /> Following the soil sampling of the canopy footings, they were backfilled by Earth Systems Engineering <br /> e was submitted under chain-of-custody documentation to Sequoia for analyses of TPH <br /> ' Group of Tracy, California A layer of filter fabric was placed at the bottom and approximately four to <br /> TPH as diesel using EPA Method $015 Modified and BTEX using EPA Method 8020, <br /> five feet of 314 inch drain rock was used to bring the bottom to approximately four to five feet below <br /> naIytical results did not report benzene in any sample above the laboratory's limits of <br /> surface grade (bsg) A second layer of filter fabric was placed over the drain rock and the remaining area <br /> iluene and ethylbenzene were reported separately in soil samples at 0 0052 <br /> was backfilled and compacted with clean imported fill ,ram (mg/kg) and 0 059 mg/kg, respectively Concentrations of total xylenes were <br /> sample at 0 0055 mg/kg Detectable concentrations of TPH as gasoline and TPH as <br /> On August 18, 1995, Delta submitted a Work Plan for Corrective Action and a subsequent Addendum to )rted in some samples and are presented in Table 3, Canopy Footing Sample Results <br /> Work Plan for Corrective Action, dated August 23, 1995 to perform confirmation soil sampling as <br /> laboratory analytical reports and chain-of-custody documentation are presented in <br /> requested by SJCEHD on August 15, 1995 Approval of the proposed work was received in a letter <br /> dated August 23, 1995, from the SJCEHD <br /> ).Debris Sampling <br /> On September 22, 1995, approximately 30 cubic yards of crushed rock and 30 cubic yards of imported 95, Delta collected soil samples from construction debris/soil generated at the site during <br /> ' backfill were removed from the area of the former northern and southern canopy footings and stockpiled <br /> ties Four Boll samples were collected per approximately every 100 cubic yards of sail <br /> on-site Approximately 10 cubic yards of the crushed rock was reused (following confirmation with into one sample by the laboratory prior to chemical analyses The soil samples were <br /> ' SJCEHD) in the base of the two pits due to the potential infiltration of ground water The remaining <br /> i as gasoline, TPH as diesel, and BTEX using the previously described methods TPH <br /> crushed rock and backfill material was stockpiled on-site and sampled for disposal BTEX were not reported above the laboratory's limits of detection from any sample <br /> ' ions (2 4 mg/kg to 9 2 mg/kg) quantified as an unidentified hydrocarbon >C 10 were <br /> Stockpiled soil was sampled on September 27, 1995, as per the requirements outlined in SJCEHD letter <br /> the TPH diesel analyses Sequoia verbally indicated that although the samples were <br /> ' dated August 23, 1995, and the methods described in Appendix B Following characterization and t a fresh diesel standard, the chromatograms were not similar to diesel and may have <br /> authorization from the SJCEHD, the soil was transported to Forward Landfill for disposal A copy of <br /> ve of traces of asphalt or plant debris A tabulation of the analytical results are presented <br /> the landfill authorization is included in Appendix D ;opies of the laboratory reports and chain-of custody documentation are presented in <br /> RPT160 STS RPTI60 S7S <br />