Laserfiche WebLink
Q <br /> A S SOCIATES I N C . <br /> xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8020, ethyl dibromide (EDB) by EPA Method 8010, and total <br /> lead by LUFT Method. <br /> Analytical results of soil samples collected from boring ASB-1 showed elevated concentrations of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons at the fill end of the tank. Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected <br /> from ASB-2 at the opposite end of the tank recorded very low levels of contamination. The <br /> absence of significant contamination at this end of the tank indicated that soil contamination was <br /> localized at the fill end of the tank. The results of the investigation were presented in Waterwork's <br /> Underground Fuel Tank Abandonment Contaminant Assessment Report, dated July 30, 1990. <br /> On January 15, and 16, 1991, to further define the vertical extent of contamination, Waterwork <br /> personnel supervised the advancement of two additional angle soil borings (BJJS-ASB 1 and BJJS- <br /> ASB2)beneath the existing tank. Borings BJJS-ASBI and BJJS-ASB2 were advanced at 45°from <br /> vertical and terminated beneath the longitudinal centerline of the tank approximately 22.5 feet and <br /> 37 feet respectively, beneath the tank bottom. One vertical soil boring (BJJS-SB3) was also <br /> advanced to investigate the extent of the contamination. Boring BJJS-MW 1 was completed as <br /> monitoring well MWI and was installed east of the tank to provide information on water quality at <br /> the site. <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbon analytes were not present at or above method detection limits in the soil <br /> samples collected from well MWI. The soil samples collected from BJJS-ASBI and BJJS-ASB2 <br /> contained detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons. The soil samples collected from <br /> BJJS-SB3 contained very low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons. <br /> Groundwater was encountered during drilling at 71.5 feet bgs and well MWI was completed to a <br /> depth of 86.5 feet bgs. The well was monitored, purged, and sampled on January 17, 1991. <br /> Laboratory analyses of the groundwater samples indicated detectable concentrations of <br /> ethylbenzene and TPHg. Benzene, toluene, and xylenes were non-detectable. Groundwater was <br /> resampled for confirmation purposes on January 24, 1991, and only xylenes and TPHg were <br /> detected in the sample. Field activities are summarized in RESNA Industries, Inc.'s Problem <br /> Assessment Report, dated June 6, 1991. <br /> On July 27, 1994, RESNA personnel supervised the advancement of one soil boring which was <br /> completed as a groundwater monitoring well. The boring was advanced to 87 feet bgs, 15 feet <br /> below the water table. Soil samples were collected at 64.5 and 70 feet bgs for analysis of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon analytes. No petroleum hydrocarbons were present at or above method detection <br /> limits in either sample. <br /> Subsequent to installation, the wellheads of well MW2 and the facility well were surveyed <br /> vertically to the site datum and the survey data were tied to well MWL Depth to water readings <br /> were collected for gradient direction and magnitude confirmation. A sample was collected from <br /> MW2 and analyzed for BTEX and TPHg. Petroleum hydrocarbon analytes were not present at or <br /> WA94304VeportslUST closure.doc 2 <br />