Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Working To Restore Nature <br /> tank utilizing 6-inch hollow stem augers Borings BJJS-ASBI and BJJS-ASB2 were advanced <br /> at 450 and 600 respectively, from vertical and terminated beneath the longitudinal center-line of <br /> 1 the tank approximately 22 5 feet, 37 feet respectively, beneath the tank bottom, (Figure 3) One <br /> vertical soil boring (BJJS--SB3) was also advanced to investigate the extent of the contamination <br /> Monitoring well MWI was installed to the east of the tank to provide information on water <br /> 1 quality at the site The location and onentations of the soil borings and monitoring well are <br /> depicted on Figure 5, RESNA's Problem Assessment Report, dated June 6, 1991 <br /> 1 Gasoline hydrocarbon analytes were not present at or above method detection limits in the soil <br /> samples collected from well MWI In ASB-1 at 45 5 and 51 5 feet BTEX was present at levels <br /> generally below 1 ppm, and TPHg was present at 6 8 and 4 2 ppm, respectively In ASB-2 at <br /> 1 26 feet below surface grade BTEX was present at levels below 1 ppm and TPHg was not present <br /> at or above method detection limits In ASB-2 at 31 feet below surface grade toluene (390 <br /> ppm), ethylbenzene (110 ppm), and xylenes (570 ppm) and TPHG (3700 ppm) were present <br /> In vertical soil boring SB3 at 21 and 26 feet BTEX was present below I ppm and TPHg was <br /> present at 1 6 ppm in the 21 foot sample and was not present in the 26 foot sample Laboratory <br /> analysis results are summarized in Table 1 <br /> 1 Lab error resulted in analysis of the soil samples for total lead instead of soluble lead Results <br /> ranging from 81 ppm to 120 ppm total lead were observed All lead concentrations are <br /> comparable indicating ambient conditions Previous soluble threshold limit concentrations for <br /> lead were also low (Table 1), therefore, not considered to be an area of concern Laboratory <br /> analysis results are summarized on Table 2 <br /> Groundwater was encountered duringdrilling at 71 5 feet below rade and the well was <br /> g g <br /> completed to 86 5 feet The well was monitored, purged and sampled on January 17, 1991 The <br /> 1 water sample was submitted to Applied Analytical to be analyzed for BTEX and TPHg <br /> Laboratory analyses of the groundwater samples indicated detectable levels of ethylbenzene and <br /> TPHG at 0 9 and 56 0 parts per billion (ppb), respectively Benzene, toluene, and xylenes were <br /> 1 non-detectable Groundwater was resampled for confirmation purposes on January 24, 1991 <br /> Only 0 6 ppb xylenes and 63 ppb TPHg were detected in the sample A summary of <br /> ' groundwater laboratory results are presented in Table 2 Chain-of-custody and laboratory data <br /> sheets are contained in Appendix II <br /> 1 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br /> ' Well MWI has been monitored and sampled on four occasions since it was installed in January <br /> 1991 (January 1991, January 1992, and January and April 1994 Petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> analytes were present during the first two sampling episodes, January 1991 and January 1992 <br /> 1 <br /> M U50066MEPORTSMP 0794 FNL 3 <br />