Laserfiche WebLink
Bank of America <br /> November 21, 1997 <br /> Environmental Services 24122 <br /> CERTIFIED MAIL <br /> RETURN RECEII'T REQUESTED <br /> Mr. Steve Sasson <br /> Senior Registered Environmental Health Specialist <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division <br /> P.O. Box 388, Stockton, California 95201-0388 <br /> Re: Bank of America Ripon Branch <br /> 234 W. Main Street, Ripon, California <br /> Dear Mr. Sasson: <br /> Thank you for discussing with me by telephone the request made in a September 16, 1997 <br /> letter from this office that San Joaquin County Public Health Services ("SJCPHS") review <br /> information gathered as part of a proposed property transfer evaluation and issue a letter <br /> stating that no further action appears to be warranted on the property. <br /> That September 16th letter, enclosed in support of its request, a report on a Phase II <br /> subsurface investigation conducted during August 1997. The September 16th letter noted <br /> that the report enclosed mistakenly had been designated as "draft," even though it was <br /> intended to be the final report. As you correctly pointed out in our telephone conversation, <br /> that copy was unsigned. In our consultant's haste to provide us with copies of this report, <br /> the cover sheet and signature page from the draft inadvertently were included in what <br /> should have been the final version. I enclose for your records a corrected copy, with the <br /> appropriate cover sheet and signature page. In all other respects, however, the enclosed is <br /> the same as the copy sent to you with the September 16th letter. Please accept my <br /> apologies for this error. <br /> At the time Bank of America N.T. & S.A. (`BoW') sent you the September 16th request <br /> for a "no further action" letter, BofA recognized (as BofA stated in the request) that the <br /> SJCPHS does not normally issue such letters for real estate transactions in which no <br /> further assessment remediation work is required. Nevertheless, BofA asked that SJCPHS <br /> consider making an exception in this instance. <br /> In our telephone conversation, you and I again discussed the fact that the information that <br /> BofA had submitted to SJCPHS for review is environmental data collected for the sole <br /> purpose of a property transfer evaluation and that there is no system for SJCPHS to review <br /> proposals for such evaluations, or to review real estate transactions in which no further <br /> assessment or remediation work is required. <br /> Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association <br /> 4000 MacArthur Boulevard Suite 100 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Phone 714/260-5819 �I Re ckO Paper <br />