Laserfiche WebLink
RAW <br /> k <br /> TQ a-1-`_ci .leo•_ <br /> P.0.1 <br /> FEB-01--NOO 00:25 FF'LfI <br /> 2.0 SamPla Analytical Results submitted <br /> analysis were <br /> Qs submitted for <br /> ,he analysis in 5tvcktan, <br /> All of the samples Inc. ,a Analytical laboratory <br /> to Roy F. Weston, <br /> California. The samples weie submitted for the following: <br /> Total <br /> petraieum Hydrocarbons <br /> o E15 Gasoline (TP};V) - bOHS method <br /> Tat <br /> 8015. - EPA method <br /> o Sen2ener Toluene, <br /> Xylene and `_:thylbenuene (RTX&E) <br /> 8020. <br /> AA method. <br /> o Total Lead (Pb) on samplr_ MCw <br /> a TPH "Fingerprint" Scan was conducted to identify <br /> Additionally, gran i5 specifically intended <br /> �1. This Fingerprint rint scan detertandtile <br /> do heavY <br /> ed gasoline. `life ins fairly recalcitrant light or <br /> weathered or ag g wttic�l� the lig <br /> fraction hydrocarbons <br /> as rapidly under natural condition,-; <br /> ,;re detected in <br /> degrade gasoline. i€ heavY it call be assumed <br /> volatile fractions of g1t or volatile Qractianst pd gasoline- <br /> that <br /> absencasolinethe <br /> pligence is that of weathered or aqe 9 <br /> that the g the Samples submitted for <br /> difficulties, eC:ified holding <br /> Due to inter wereranoty analyzed within the pp <br /> STX&E analy the BTX&E results are act veri£Iable and have <br /> period. Therefore, <br /> not been reported, resented in tabular <br /> contains the laboratory analytical <br /> The analytical resultgs for the samples are p Recommended Maximum <br /> able 2. Appendix A are the <br /> form Gn `� the State of California <br /> report• Alsa included an Tasoil2per x These maximum <br /> Concentrations in _UFT' <br /> ,UFT should not <br /> Allowable jerground Fuel Tank Fi-1d Manua Q dations and h <br /> Leaking concentrations ar.h sorely recomm n <br /> allowable Na definitive action <br /> be considered to be s are <br /> cleanup �;ction levels. compound <br /> ator agency on a site and <br /> s have been established lfor Y svline. The site <br /> d com'thp the <br /> level the local reg practical expert <br /> determined by 4iawever, TreaTsk's P the site Conditions <br /> specific basis- agencies and knowledge °¢ would most <br /> local regulatory <br /> indicate that the reCtom�hdi.�dsiteels listed in Table <br /> likely be applicable and <br /> r the results for the Z lficatiionstOf <br /> sections discuss discussion of the imp <br /> The follow . Additionally these sections. <br /> lead analysis <br /> the analytical results is Included n <br /> cc O 6 <br /> 2tra._ eu total <br /> 2.3 �-—. <br /> - --- -- --- - - This was sample <br /> ---- 1e--exhibited_-.detectable co�Pf icendrat ons <br /> and -same --only dr)carbons (valatil� f C � th (of nine fest 1, wh le <br /> petroleum by at s sample MCW ,¢1, while <br /> MCW f2 which was collected <br /> exhibited a TPfiV concentration of 230m9lkg• <br /> 5 <br />