My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MINER
>
135
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541800
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2020 4:49:55 PM
Creation date
3/16/2020 2:00:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0541800
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023969
FACILITY_NAME
CANCUN RESTAURANT
STREET_NUMBER
135
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MINER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13908010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
135 E MINER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 November 2010 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 907-1587 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br /> samples collected from the wells MW-1A, MW-113 and MW-213 at a maximum <br /> concentration of 13,000 pg/I. <br /> Additionally, TAME was detected in monitoring well MW-1A at a concentration of 8.9 pg/I; <br /> benzene was detected in wells MW-1A, MW-113, MW-2B and MW-3B at a maximum <br /> concentration of 410 pg/I; toluene was detected in wells MW-1A, MW-1 B and MW-213 at <br /> a maximum concentration of 43 pg/I; ethylbenzene was detected in wells MW-1A and <br /> MW-1B at a maximum concentration of 1,700 pg/I; and xylene was detected in wells <br /> MW-1A, MW-16, MW-2B and MW-3B at a maximum concentration of 971 pg/I. <br /> Other petroleum products or additives were not detected above laboratory reporting limits <br /> in any additionally analyzed soil or ground water samples collected during the July,August <br /> or October environmental events at the site. Analytical results of soil and ground water <br /> samples collected during the third and fourth quarters of 2010 are summarized in Table 1 <br /> and Table 2, respectively. The laboratory report (CTEL Project No. CT214-1008004, <br /> 1008075 and 1010063), chain of custody forms and the laboratory quality <br /> assurance/quality control(QA/QC)reports are included in Appendix F. Confirmation for the <br /> submitted laboratory electronic deliverable format (EDF) files to GeoTracker are <br /> 3308030128, 5607401549, 7796494483. <br /> 3.3 GROUND WATER ELEVATION, FLOW DIRECTION AND GRADIENT <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data <br /> collected on 08 October 2010. Hydrocarbon-impact to ground water was quantified by <br /> laboratory analytical data. At the time of the October 2010 sampling event: <br /> Hydrogeoloqic Zone HU1: 20 to 40 feet bsq <br /> Depth to ground water in the shallow ground water interval (20 to 40 feet bsg) was found <br /> at 20.28 feet (MW-1 A) below the top of the well casing (btoc). Ground water elevation at <br /> the water table was at 7.90 feet below North American Vertical Datum (NAVD88). <br /> Hydrogeoloqic Zone HU2: 55 to 60 feet bsq <br /> • Depths to ground water ranged between 21.92 feet (MW-1 B) below the tops of the <br /> well casings(btoc)and 23.00 feet(MW-3B) btoc(Table 1). Ground water elevations <br /> at the site ranged between 9.49 feet (MW-7) below North American Vertical Datum <br /> (NAVD88) and 10.95 feet (MW-4B) below NAVD88. <br /> • Utilizing site wells MW-1 B through MW-4B, ground water flow direction was inferred <br /> to be flowing north-northeast at an approximate hydraulic gradient of 0.01 foot per <br /> Advanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.