Laserfiche WebLink
r1 <br /> I <br /> ' 17 February 2004 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 96-0254 <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br /> 6 2 1 Feasibility Testing <br /> ' An ozone spargingpilot test has not been performed at the site Data from soil samples collected at <br /> P P P <br /> the site indicate that silty sands are present in the water bearing zone impacted with MTBE The site <br /> stratigraphy has silty sands that typically possess hydraulic conductivity values that are favorable for <br /> air sparging and ozone injection via air-sparging Due to the readily higher vapor pressure of MTBE, <br /> ' low Henry's Law Constant and MTBE's higher aqueous solubility or the tendency to remain <br /> dissolved,the m-si�u,treatment should bean effective remedial alternative In other words,treatment <br /> should be conduct0in the ground water media(saturated soil/water) <br /> 6 2 2 Duration <br /> ' Sufficient data is not available to accurately predict the duration necessary to mitigate a site using <br /> in-situ oxidation via ozone sparging as the remedial alternative Mitigation duration is site specific, <br /> ' therefore a pilot study could be performed at the site before predictions can be made The reduction <br /> efficiency should be based on in-situ dissolved oxygen measurement,redox potential measurements <br /> (ORP)and ground water sampling with a MTBE-concentration trend analysis over the entire sparging <br /> ' • time frame <br /> ' 6 2 3 Cost <br /> Costs for installation of an ozone system typically ranges from $15,000 to $45,000, including the <br /> 1 installation of sparging wells and underground piping Based on an operational period of 12 to 24 <br /> months, costs for the entire project would likely be between $45,000 and $100,000 <br /> ' 7.0. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REMEDIATION OF HYDROCARBON- <br /> IMPACTED GROUND WATER <br /> AGE believes that an in-situ oxidation remediation would be more effective in both cost and <br /> performance over a "pump and treat" method AGE recommends a six month ozone sparging <br /> operation at the site as depicted in Figure 6, to determine the effectiveness of In-situ oxidation via <br /> ozone sparging as the remedial alternative and if demonstrated as suitable,modify the scope of work <br /> ' to perform continual remediation utilizing the in-situ remedial method <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Enc. <br />