Laserfiche WebLink
2.5 Assessment of Hydrocarbon Impacted Groundwater <br /> It is our understanding that prior to January 1995, groundwater samples from the site had <br /> been collected on three occasions. During each sampling event, free hydrocarbon product <br /> was detected in MW-1, therefore, no samples were collected. Petroleum hydrocarbons have <br /> ' also been detected in samples from MW-3 and MW-4 during each sampling event Well <br /> Point samples (hydropunch) collected by SEACOR indicate that hydrocarbon impacted <br /> groundwater may extend southwest off-site nearly 200 feet However, no monitoring wells <br /> ' are located down-gradient of MW-3 <br /> 2.6 Aquifer Testing <br /> A pump test was performed at the site by SEACOR Groundwater was <br /> extracted m <br /> MW-1 and drawdown was measured in three surrounding wells The test duras onf was <br /> apprommately 24 hours <br /> SEACOR concluded in the PAR that drawdown data collected during the pump test <br /> Iindicated that the pumping from MW-1 has little influence at the site Therefore, a pump <br /> and treat system of groundwater remediation would likely be ineffective at the site <br /> Complete pump test data was included to the PAR <br /> 27 Vapor Extraction Test <br /> On June 10, 1994, SEACOR conducted a soil vapor extraction test at the site A vacuum <br /> was applied to an extraction well (VW-1) and measurements of flow rate and vacuum w <br /> collected fiom three temporary observation wells (VW-2, VW-3 and VW-4) However, a <br /> ' vacuum could not be achieved on VW-1, so the internal combustion (IC) unit was connected <br /> to one of the obsenation wells It appears that VW-1 may have been placed too close to <br /> the western UST excavation, which was backfilled with pea gravel, and "shoe t circuited" the <br /> attempt to draw a significant vacuum <br /> Despite the short circuiting of VW-1, SEACOR concluded that vapor extraction would be <br /> a viable remediation alternative for impacted soil at the site The data collected during the <br /> pilot test indicated that sufficient flow and hydrocarbon recovery rates can be achieved at <br /> the site <br /> 2.8 Additional Investigation <br /> Because of the inconclusive results obtained by SEACOR duringthe vapor <br /> representatives of the PHS/EHD indicated that a 24-hour soil vapor a tract on/n-s to aitr <br /> spa'91ng pilot study should be perfol need Installation of additional extraction and sparging <br /> wells would also provide additional soil and groundwater data for preparation of a FRP <br /> 6-1.1-1 A.&S.—I.e. <br /> ' CK'%P[W FRPn 951SC 94 12 1o5602 3 <br />