Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> i <br /> ' 12 January 1998 <br /> • AGE-NC-95-0103 <br /> Page 2 of 7 3 _ <br /> water purging parameters are Included in Appendix A <br /> 2 2 _ GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> Water samples were retrieved from each purged well using new disposable bailers The samples <br /> were transferred into 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml of 18%hydrochloric acid <br /> as a preservative and were transported in a chilled container under chain-of-custody to McCampbell <br /> Analytical, Inc (MAI), in Pacheco,California, for laboratory analysis <br /> Samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g), volatile <br /> T aromatic compounds (benzene, toluene,ethyl-benzene and total xylenes BTE&X) and methyl-tert- <br /> butyl ether (MTBE) and the oxygenating fuel additives tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), di-isopropyl <br /> ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE) and tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME) in <br /> accordance with EPA methods 8015m and 8020 and 8260m- <br /> 23 <br /> 260m23 IN-SITU AIR SPRAGINdSYSTEM REPAIRS y <br /> On 22`December 1997 the inlet pressure line fitting for IAS system compressor was replaced Wear <br /> and possibly damage incurred during shipping caused a system failure The system was non- <br /> operational from 18 December to 23 December 1997 <br /> -2 4 SPARGING/EXTRACTION SYSTEM MONITORING <br /> The IAS system operated continually during the quarter, except during the above mentioned repair <br /> period and was monitored and serviced weekly The sparging flow rate was adjusted to <br /> approximately 10 scfm and to a minimum pressure of 15 psi During each monitoring event, the <br /> depth to ground water and per cent dissolved oxygen were measured for each monitoring well(Table <br /> - 3) General system maintenance and adjustments were performed in October and December 1997 <br /> _ Due to unstable operation and lowerformance the SVE unit was monitored ed daily, when possible <br /> The flow rate of extracted vapor was measured using a Dwyer differential pressure flow meter <br /> Organic vapor concentrations in the extracted soil gas stream were measured before entering the <br /> blower (influent stream),between the carbon canisters, and after exiting the canisters (effluent <br /> - stream) using an organic vapor-meter (OVA) equipped with a photo-ionization detector (PID <br /> Thermo Environmental 580A, 10 OeV, calibrated to isobutylene) <br /> Only two soil vapor samples were collected during this quarter On 22 October and 26 November <br /> - r <br /> _ Advanced GeaEnvironmental,Inc <br /> f, <br />