My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0000404
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GUERNSEY
>
3420
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-90-52
>
SU0000404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2020 4:26:06 PM
Creation date
3/27/2020 10:46:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0000404
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-90-52
STREET_NUMBER
3420
STREET_NAME
GUERNSEY
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
9/19/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3420 GUERNSEY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 14, 1990 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> MS 90-52 <br /> b. The condition requiring Parcel 1 to connect to public sewers <br /> should be at the time a building permit is submitted and <br /> approved and not prior to recording of the final map. <br /> c. The existing building on Parcel 2 is currently served <br /> by Calif. Water Service Co. a public water supply system. <br /> The condition requiring Parcel 1 to connect to public water <br /> should be at the time a building permit is submitted and <br /> approved and not prior to recording the final map. <br /> d. The condition requiring the abandonment of the existing <br /> septic tank should be when Parcel 2 is connected to a <br /> public sewer and not prior to recording of the final map. <br /> See 2a. <br /> 4. County Counsel <br /> a. First time I have seen this requirement. Does the County <br /> want condition (a) to be placed on the final map? Why? <br /> Mr. Whiteside wishes to subdivide the land into two ( 2) <br /> parcels per the revised tentative map. In lieu of the parcels <br /> being 0. 732 and 0. 686 acres he wants them to be 1.072 and <br /> 0. 346 acres (15080 sf) . See attached map. The smaller parcel <br /> would meet minimum zoning of 15000 sf. Can this be done? <br /> I have submitted the final map to the Surveyors Office based <br /> on the revised parcel size and would appreciate a response <br /> to this letter as soon as possible. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Ronald P. Weldum <br /> Civil Engineer <br /> Attachments. <br /> cc Mark Whiteside <br /> Ron Stein <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.