My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
4520
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0001611
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:59:16 PM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:11:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0001611
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0004071
FACILITY_NAME
YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC
STREET_NUMBER
4520
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
17920034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4520 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`tea <br /> r <br /> Sampling <br /> �-- The data collected during 1994 are subject to uncertainty associated with sampling and <br /> analysis. These data are presented in other parts of this health risk assessment. In the <br /> risk assessment, it was assumed that samples collected were representative of conditions <br /> Jo which various populations may be exposed. However, the collected samples may not <br /> be completely representative due to biases in sampling and to random variability of <br /> samples. In general, sampling was biased toward areas of known and suspected elevated <br /> chemical concentrations, which will lead to an overestimation of risk when these results <br /> '~ are assumed to represent a larger area. <br /> The placement of soil borings and monitoring wells was, in part, purposely biased to <br /> detect and characterize potential hot spots of soil and potential groundwater <br /> ;—. contamination based on historical site use. This type of sampling approach is likely to <br /> overestimate the chemical concentrations to which a receptor would be exposed and the <br /> potential health impact to the receptors evaluated. <br /> Analysis <br /> Samples were analyzed using California State Certified Laboratory procedures and were <br /> subjected to limited review, to obtain data suitable for decision-making. However, it <br /> should be understood that sample analysis is subject to uncertainties associated with <br /> precision, accuracy, and detection of chemicals at low concentrations. Analytical <br /> '�- precision and accuracy are evaluated through laboratory QA programs. Uncertainties <br /> associated with precision and accuracy of analysis are generally random errors which may <br /> lead to over- or underestimation of risks. These errors are typically of low magnitude <br /> (well below an order of magnitude) compared to other sources of uncertainty in the risk <br /> assessment. <br /> Due to the limits of analytical methodologies and the complexity of matrixes for <br /> environmental samples, some chemicals present in low concentrations in samples may <br /> not be detected, leading to a possible underestimation of risk. This potential source of <br /> uncertainty is addressed during data evaluation, as described below. <br /> S:\LDC\YELLO.RPT May 4,1995 7-2 <br /> +.r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.