My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
4520
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0001611
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:59:16 PM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:11:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0001611
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0004071
FACILITY_NAME
YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC
STREET_NUMBER
4520
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
17920034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4520 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.1.1 Data Evaluation <br /> The highest detected concentration and the 95 percent UCL concentrations of chemicals <br /> detected in each medium were complied for use in the risk assessment. It was assumed <br /> that a chemical not detected in a given sample was actually present at one-half of its <br /> detection limit if that chemical was present in any sample in a given media. This <br /> assumption is probably conservative and may lead to overestimation of risk, particularly <br /> for those chemicals reported with low frequency and low concentrations. The highest <br /> detected concentration was used in evaluation of RME exposures, an assumption which, <br /> compared to the 95 percent UCL may lead to overestimation of risk. <br /> 7.2 CHEMICAL FATE AND TRANSPORT MODELING UNCERTAINTIES <br /> The models used to estimate the fate and transport of chemicals for this risk assessment <br /> are consistent with those recommended by EPA in its Superfund Exposure Assessment <br /> Manual (EPA 1988). Because of uncertainties in modeling, EPA-recommended models <br /> and input parameters are conservative and produce exposure concentrations that should <br /> not underestimate the health risks. Assumptions of the modeling are discussed in <br /> Section 3.0. <br /> Modeling assumptions were conservative and were designed to be protective of <br /> groundwater and human health. Conservative assumptions include no biodegradation Y <br /> in soil or groundwater, highest detected concentrations and 95 percent UCL <br /> concentrations, high porosity in groundwater, high infiltration for residential scenarios, <br /> and seasonal high groundwater used for RME child resident scenario. <br /> 7.3 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UNCERTAINTIES <br /> Risk assessments require assumptions in order to assess potential human exposure. This <br /> risk assessment includes assumptions about general characteristics and potential patterns <br /> of human exposure of the population in the vicinity of the site which were based upon: <br /> • Limited site-specific information <br /> S:1LDC\YELL0.1?FT May 4,1995 7-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.