My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
4520
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0001611
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:59:16 PM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:11:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0001611
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0004071
FACILITY_NAME
YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC
STREET_NUMBER
4520
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
17920034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4520 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• EPA Guidance (EPA 1989b)and the EPA Exposure Factors Handbook <br /> ., (EPA 1989a) <br /> • Professional judgment t <br /> In this risk assessment, average and reasonable.maximum exposures were calculated to <br /> provide some measure of the range and uncertainty in potential exposures. The average <br /> case represents a set of exposure assumptions considered to be central values or best <br /> estimates. The average case is, nevertheless, conservative in its„exposure, estimates <br /> because it assumes that exposure routinely occurs. The reasonable maximum case is <br /> developed to provide an upper bound on exposure. Because reasonable maximum <br /> exposure estimates are based .on a combination of conservative assumptions, the <br /> estimates are highly unlikely to reflect exposures that-are generally encountered at the <br /> site. <br /> Specific conservative assumptions that tend t overestimate p p o o e estimate actual site risks are fisted <br /> { below: <br /> • It was assumed"that occupational employees would ingest 100 percent <br /> of the average daily water amount from the site and not from other <br /> sources, like home and restaurants. <br /> • It was assumed that occupational employees would shower onsite every <br /> day that they work at the site. <br /> { <br /> For inhalation exposures for occupational employees it was assumed <br /> that they would work outside 8 hours per day with an inhalation rate <br /> that indicates strenuous activity. <br /> • As a conservative approach, potential risks from the YFS site were <br /> evaluated for hypothetical future residents. These scenarios are of low <br /> probability because the future land use at the site has been designated <br /> ` as a motor freight terminal, which means the facility will be maintained <br /> and not made'available for other uses in the near future. <br /> !Li_ v c. <br /> • For adult and child residential exposures it wasassumed that 100 <br /> j percent of all ingested water would come from the groundwater and not <br /> .�� other sources. _ <br /> S:\LDC\YHLLO.Rn May 4,1995 7-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.