Laserfiche WebLink
CARR ASSOCIATES <br /> Mr. Mark Adams <br /> March 30, 2006 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> Associates made previously in response to our review of the Draft Feasibility Study and the <br /> Revised Draft Feasibility Study reports. Please review the other comments Farr Associates made <br /> in previous comment letters, and address the unresolved issues raised in those letters when <br /> completing the revised Site Feasibility Study report. <br /> Finally, considering that the Site Remedial Investigation Report was completed December 10, <br /> 1999, and the first Draft Feasibility Study was completed May 5, 2000, it is very important that <br /> LCERT complete the feasibility study process and select the final site remedy in the near future. <br /> The progress on evaluation of potential remedial technologies and remedial alternatives for the <br /> Site has been unreasonably slow, and LPL needs to see this process concluded as soon as <br /> practicable. <br /> Thank you for your assistance in addressing our concerns, and we look forward to receiving the <br /> revised Draft Feasibility Study report. Please feel free to call the undersigned to discuss things at <br /> any time. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> ohnM. Farr, Ph.D., P.E. Anne M. Farr, Ph. <br /> Chief Engineer Chief Geohydrologist <br /> cc: Phil Johnson, Sims Groupe Management <br /> Marie McCrink, California RWQCB, Central Valley Region <br /> Mike Infurna, San Joaquin County EHD <br /> David Gouker, City of Stockton Public Library, Public Repositories <br /> David Sadoff, AIG Environmental <br /> Donald Bradshaw, LFR <br /> Lucas Goldstein, LFR <br />