Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 3 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 8:47 AM <br /> To: 'Chris Panaitescu' <br /> Subject: RE: Best California Gas Ltd SS # 172, 7647 Pacific Ave, Stockton, CA 95207 <br /> the work plan I have is stamped DRAFT. <br /> is there a FINAL available? <br /> From: Chris Panaitescu [mailto:panaitescu@Thrifty0il.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 12:24 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: Barry W Berkett; Larry Higinbotham; rvogl@geohydrologic.com; TEAMTAFOYA@aol.com <br /> Subject: RE: Best California Gas Ltd SS # 172, 7647 Pacific Ave, Stockton, CA 95207 <br /> Mike, <br /> Thank you! <br /> With respect to the over excavation, in our "Work plan for well abandonment, replacement well installation, <br /> reconfiguration of conveyance piping and Interim remedial Action by over excavation in conjunction with <br /> UST system removal"dated 08/02/07, section 4.3.2. we have proposed the over excavation in conjunction <br /> with UST removal, if contamination is encountered in the soil samples collected. <br /> Based on the results of the soil samples collected during different previous investigations conducted in the <br /> UST area, we estimated approximately 170 c.y. (50' x 30' x 3') to be excavated. In addition, part of the soil <br /> excavated for UST removal purpose, exhibiting more than 50 ppmv PID reading, is proposed to be <br /> transported off site for recycling, instead of being use for backfilling. In this way I believe that we will <br /> eliminate an important secondary source of contamination, which will reduce the future remediation effort. <br /> Since the UST removal is a unique opportunity to economically apply the remediation by excavation at a <br /> cost significantly lower than other methods, please approve our proposal as presented in our above <br /> mentioned work plan. <br /> With respect to the public comments, it is my opinion that the proposed Interim Remedial Action should be <br /> exempt from the public notification requirement because this action is not a stand alone remedial plan, but <br /> it is part of the UST removal and it will be applied during the UST removal. <br /> Thank you again, <br /> Chris <br /> Chris Panaitescu <br /> Thrift),Oil Co.Best California Gas,Ltd.. <br /> 13116 Imperial Hwy. <br /> Santa Fe Springs,CA 90670 <br /> ph:(562)921-3581 x 390 <br /> fax:(562)921-7510 <br /> email: Panaitescu(ii;Tkrif(t•Oil.com <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 8:29 AM <br /> To: Chris Panaitescu <br /> Subject: RE: Best California Gas Ltd SS # 172, 7647 Pacific Ave, Stockton, CA 95207 <br /> Chris, <br /> I got this and so far, I have no problem with it. <br /> were you planning on doing any over-excavation at the time of UST removal if you encounter any? <br /> If so, a corrective action plan must be submitted and the site must go through a public comment <br /> 12/10/2007 <br />