Laserfiche WebLink
Vapor Extraction Test Report <br /> Former Thrifty Oil Service Station # 172 <br /> September 14, 1995 <br /> For the purpose of determining the range of hydrocarbons present in the subsurface, soil <br /> vapor samples were collected from the test wells (Monitoring Wells VW-A, VW-B, VW-C), <br /> during the beginning and end of their respective tests The samples were analyzed for: <br /> 0 Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G) using EPA Method 8015 modified for <br /> gasoline; and <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) using EPA Method 8020 <br /> Refer to Appendix C for copies of the official Laboratory Reports and Cham of Custody <br /> Records. <br /> 3.0 CAARACTERIZATTON ANALYSIS <br /> Stabilized vacuum responses in the observation wells were assumed to represent steady-state <br /> conditions, and were used to calculate the soil transmissibility to air ('kh/µ), the soil permeability <br /> (k), and an effective radius-of-influence (ERI). In order to estimate these parameters, a <br /> steady-state solution of Darcy's law, as applied to compressible gas flow, was used to simulate <br /> the subsurface flow conditions. Refer to Appendix D for a mathematical description of the Darcy <br /> analytical solution, and for the calculations performed to estimate the soil transmissibility to air, <br /> soil permeability, and ERI. <br /> ERI was also estimated graphically by plotting the log of distance from the test well versus <br /> observed vacuum response. ERI is estimated to be the distance from the extraction well where <br /> the vacuum response is equal to 0.1 inches of water, and can be read directly from the graph <br /> (Figure 2). <br /> 4.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> 4 1 FIELD OBSERVATIONS <br /> The amount of vacuum that could be applied to each test well by the internal combustion (IC) <br /> engine test equipment was limited by the minimum oxygen requirement of the IC engine and the <br /> low oxygen content of the extracted soil vapor. Field observations recorded during the tests were <br /> as follows: <br /> • During the constant-flow-rate test from Test Well VW-A, a vacuum level of 7.5 in. H,,O <br /> was measured in the extraction well while extracting vapors at a flow rate of approximately <br /> 16.6 scfm. Vacuum responses ranging from 0.05 to 0.31 in. H2O were detected in <br /> Observation Wells VW-B, VW-C, MW-1, MW-3, MW-4, and My-8. These observation <br /> wells are located at distances ranging from 26 to 90 feet from the test well. <br /> - 2 <br />