My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE (3)
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
3978
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518304
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:57:06 PM
Creation date
4/1/2020 4:12:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518304
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0013818
FACILITY_NAME
LOW PRICE AUTO GLASS
STREET_NUMBER
3978
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
17917103
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3978 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LOW-THREAT UST CASE CLOSURE POLICY - CHECKLIST <br /> c <br /> Responsible Party: <br /> Case Name: <br /> Site Address: <br /> Lead Agency: <br /> GeoTracker Global ID: 3T�Pj� <br /> In the absence of unique attributes of a case or site-specific conditions that demonstrably increase <br /> the risk associated with residual petroleum constituents, cases that meet general and media-specific <br /> criteria described below pose a low threat to human health, safety or environment and are <br /> appropriate for UST case closure. <br /> General Criteria: <br /> 1. Is the unauthorized release located within the service area of a public water system? <br /> ❑ Yes L�rNo <br /> 2. Does the unauthorized release consist only of petroleum? <br /> Yes [:] No <br /> 3. Has the unauthorized ("primary") release from the UST system been stopped? <br /> Yes ❑ No <br /> 4. Has free product been removed to the maximum extent practicable? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No �2/ <br /> 5. Has a conceptual site model that assesses the nature, extent, and mobility of the release been <br /> developed? <br /> ❑ Yes .❑'No <br /> 6. Has secondary source been removed to the extent practicable? <br /> ffYes ❑ No <br /> 7. Has soil or groundwater been tested for MTBE and results reported in accordance with Health and <br /> Safety Code Section 25296.15? <br /> . 'Yes [:] No <br /> 8. Does nuisance as defined by Water Code section 13050 exist at the site? <br /> ❑ <br /> YesVo <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.