Laserfiche WebLink
Robert Boust/UNOCAL#5098 page 2 <br /> 5606 Pacific Ave., Stockton. <br /> In PHS-EHD correspondence dated September 30, 1996 and February 26, 1997, <br /> UNOCAL was advised that due to the high levels of groundwater contamination <br /> consistently recorded in the down-gradient wells, additional soil investigation north of <br /> MW-11 and MW-12 was required. PHS-EHD concluded the "source" of this <br /> contamination as undefined and would require the assessment of the site to continue <br /> until the source was delineated. ERI's work plan included a copy of an August 25, <br /> 1989 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) letter as <br /> support for not including the required soil borings in the work plan. In 1989 PHS- <br /> EHD was not the lead agency for this underground storage tank investigation and <br /> was not included in the evaluation of the effectiveness of the soil remediation. <br /> The CVRWQCB letter does not relieve you of any liability under the California Health <br /> and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future operations at the site. <br /> Nor does it relieve you of the responsibility to clean up existing, additional, or <br /> previously unidentified conditions at the site, which cause or threaten to cause <br /> pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water quality or public health. <br /> The August 25, 1989 CVRWQCB letter expressed the most current conditions at the <br /> time. Unfortunately the long periods of minimal monitoring and fack of remedial <br /> activity since have supplied data that indicates a source still remains at the site and it <br /> continues to impact the groundwater. The consistent elevated levels of petroleum <br /> (50,000 ug/I TPH-G and 1,500 ug/I Benzene in MW-11, Sept-1997) support this <br /> conclusion. <br /> With this consistent impact and degradation to the groundwater below this site, PHS- <br /> EHD has concluded that significant contamination, not included, investigated, or <br /> remediated in Unocal's 1989 investigation, still remains at this site and must be <br /> investigated further. <br /> PHS-EHD will allow this work plan to proceed with the following conditions. The <br /> missing items noted above are to be included in an addendum submitted to PHS- <br /> EHD immediately. Additionally, soil borings are to be placed north of MW-11 and <br /> MW-12. Soil contamination at the historical drought depth is to have the lateral, as <br /> well as the vertical extent defined. Monitoring wells may be required if the soil <br /> and/or groundwater samples appear contaminated. <br /> In a telephone conversation with the City of Stockton Public Work/Encroachment <br /> Permitting Department, Mr. Jason Ender has indicated that monitoring wells cannot <br /> be placed in traffic lanes. Proposed monitoring wells MW-20S and MW-20D cannot <br /> be constructed in the proposed locations. Mr. Ender has indicated that although <br /> monitoring wells cannot be installed, borings or push-points to groundwater may be <br /> possible in the traffic lane at special times and days if your modified plan meets <br /> PHS-EHD and City of Stockton requirements. You may contact Mr. Enders at (209) <br /> 937-8349 to obtain the push-point and other monitoring well encroachment and/or <br /> revocable permit requirements. <br />