Laserfiche WebLink
2 2 SEWER LINE INVESTIGATION <br />' Montgomery Ward suspected that a broken sewer line may be the source of <br /> contamination in Boring B-6 On June 9, 1991, Pacific Pipeline Survey (PPS) was retained <br /> by Montgomery Ward to investigate the existence of a possible break in the sanitary sewer <br /> manhole, associated piping, and a clarifier which are located in close proximity to the <br />' former location of the gasoline USTs According to this investigation, about one foot of <br /> the sewer line was broken <br /> On September 12, 1991, representatives of Stone Brothers excavated a trench around <br /> the suspected broken sewer line to an approximate depth of 2 5 feet bgs (see Figure 2) <br /> Two slant borings were drilled around the sewer line using a hand auger Commencing <br />' near the base of the clay pipe (2 5 feet bgs), Boring SB-1 was hand augered to a calculated <br /> vertical depth of 5 75 feet bgs Two soil samples (SS-1 and SS-2) were collected from SB-1 <br /> at a depth of 3 5 and 5 5 bgs, respectively Boring SB-2 was hand augered to an estimated <br /> depth of 4.75 feet bgs in the sidewall of the excavation and a soil sample (SS-3) was <br /> collected at the termination depth. The boring was terminated approximately beneath a <br />' second sewer line that extends west of the manhole <br />' No TPH were detected in any of the three soil samples associated with the sewer line <br /> However, minor concentrations of BTXE, bromoform, carbon disulfide, chloroform, <br /> tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1-trichloroethane and <br /> 1,1,2-trichloroethane were detected in the soil samples (see EAI, 1991A). <br /> 2 3 PRODUCT LINE/FUEL ISLAND INVESTIGATION <br /> In June 1986, after the gasoline USTs were removed, the underground piping <br /> associated with the USTs was rinsed, stubbed back, capped and left in place pursuant to <br /> approval from the County <br /> On September 12 and 13, 1991, 12 slant borings were hand augered to depths of <br /> approximately four feet bgs Soil samples PL-1 to PL-12 were collected along the product <br /> lines which extend between the former fuel islands and the former UST locations (see <br /> Figure 2). <br /> No detectable concentrations of TPH were present in any soil samples, except for soil <br /> sample PL-7. TPH (844 ppm), toluene (0.95 gm) ethylbenzene (0 65 ppm) andxylenes <br /> (9 SS ppm) were detected in soil sample PL-74-4 5'. Benzene was not detected in soil <br /> sample PL-7 (see EAI, 1991) <br /> In July 1992, EAI drilled and sampled two additional borings (Borings B-9 and B-10) <br /> in the vicinity of the fuel islands on the east and west sides of PL-7 (see Figure 2). Elevated <br /> concentrations of TPH (1,200 to 3,490 ppm) were detected from sam les B-9 @ 15' <br /> through B-9 @ 30'. Total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH� were detected <br /> t only in sample B-9 @ 20' at 563 ppm No benzene was detected in any of the samples <br /> tested. Elevated concentrations of toluene, xylenes and ethylbenzene were also detected in <br /> inose samples whlc11 11 U elevated i'gH ConC'el7trdtloll5. The total lead %oilceiltratii3i7s <br /> varied from 5.72 to 13 4 ppm No soluble lead was detected in the sample (B-10 @ 10) <br /> which contained the highest total lead concentration The carbon chain breakdown for the <br /> hydrocarbons present in sample B-9 @ 20' indicate a hydrocarbon range from C8 to C18, <br /> with-the maximum-occurring-in the C9-C10 range-(see EAI; 1992) - -- - - - - - <br /> Project No. 1232 3 ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT,INC® <br />