Laserfiche WebLink
3.0 FIELD WORK <br />' 3.1 DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING <br /> Between February 23 and 26, 1993, three borings (B-11, MW-1 and MW-2) were <br />' drilled and sampled on the site as approximately shown on Figure 2. The borings were <br /> drilled by Layne-Western Company of Woodland, California (State License C57# 510011), <br /> under supervision of EAI geologists. Boring B-11 was drilled to a depth of 50 feet bgs at <br /> the center of the concrete slab which formerly contained the USTs. Bonngs MW-1 and <br /> MW-2 were drilled to a depth of 70 feet bgs adjacent to the concrete slab and vicinity of the <br /> former fuel islands, respectively (see Figure 2) The borings were drilled using 12-inch <br />' outside diameter continuous flight hollow stem augers. Mike Infurna of the County was <br /> on-site dunn& most of the drilling and sampling activities All borings were logged in <br /> accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (see Appendix A). <br />' Soil samples were obtained from each boring beginning at approximately 5 feet bgs <br /> and at approximatelyy 5-foot intervals thereafter until termination. The samples were <br /> collected using six 2.5-inch diameter by 3-inch long brass tubes mounted within a 2 5-inch <br /> inside diameter split-spoon drive sampler employed in advance of the augers After sample <br />' recovery, the ends of the lowermost 3-inch long tube were covered with aluminum foil and <br /> plastic caps taped over the ends Prior to use, all tubes were washed in a solution of <br /> Alconox detergent and tap water, rinsed with tap water and then with distilled water. The <br /> f samples were labeled with the sample point identification, EAI project number, depth <br /> interval, time and date, individually sealed in "Ziploc" plastic bags, and immediately placed <br /> into an ice chest chilled using crushed ice The samples were kept chilled until delivered to <br /> the laboratory for analxcal testing All samples were logged on chain of custody record <br /> forms (see Appendix Br <br /> An HNU Model DL-101 Photoioruzer/Datalogger calibrated against an isobutylene <br /> gas standard was used on soil contained in the second tube from the bottom of the shoe, at <br /> each sampling interval within the borings to determine if volatile hydrocarbon vapors were <br /> emanating directly from the soil Each sample was placed in an airtight "Ziploc" plastic <br /> bag. The samples were allowed to sit in the sun, and then the head space in the bags was <br /> analyzed using the HNU Photoionizer The results of this testing were recorded on the <br /> boring logs (see Appendix A) <br /> 3 2 MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION <br /> Borings MW-1 and MW-2 were converted to ground water monitoring wells MW-1 <br /> and MW-2, respectively (see Figure 2) Appendix C contains the County permits issued for <br /> construction of the wells All wells were constructed of 4-inch inside diameter flush <br /> threaded Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well casing The wells were designed with <br /> I a slotted section (0 02-inch x 2-inch slots) which extended from approximately 48 feet bgs to <br /> terrmnation depth of each well The annular space between the borehole wall and well <br /> casing was backfilled with grade #3 Monterey sand to about 5 feet above the slotted <br /> section A 2-foot thick layer of hydrated quarter-inch diameter bentonite pellets was <br /> placed directly on top of the sand pack as a sanitary seal, and the remaining annular space <br /> was backfilled with cement and bentonite grout to the surface Flush mounted lockable <br /> traffic grates were placed on all the wells. Further, the grates were designed to prevent <br /> sheet flow from-entering-the-wells—Appendix-D-contains-the-specific well-construction- <br /> details for each well Mike Infurna of the County was present during the grouting of the <br /> wells. <br /> I <br /> Project No 1232 4 ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT,INC <br />