Laserfiche WebLink
Douglas Roderick <br /> November 20, 1998 <br /> Page 3 <br /> EAI <br /> The proposal cost is $285,980, which includes two years operation and monitoring The <br /> proposal conforms to the equipment and specifications contained in the CAP EAI has performed <br /> all asfiessment activities at the site and is, for that reason, most familiar with site conditions <br /> SCS <br /> The proposal cost is $316,130, which includes two years operation and reporting There is <br /> insufficient information in the SCS proposal to determine whether the equipment to be provided <br /> meets the CAP specifications <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Based strictly on cost, the Flour Daniel GTI proposal appears to be the lowest bid, followed by <br /> EAI, SCS and Terra Vac Considering other factors, such as site knowledge, experience and <br /> stability of the companies (see Table 1), EAI ranks first followed by SCS, Flour Daniel GTI and <br /> Terra Vac Montgomery Ward therefore proposes to engage EAI to implement the CAP <br /> We understand that a meeting between PHS/EHD, the Fund, Montgomery Ward and <br /> Unocal may be appropriate prior to engaging a contractor and implementing the CAP Please <br /> provide me pre-approval of the proposed cost of work and inform me of your availability to <br /> participate in a meeting with PHS/EHD <br /> Very truly yours, <br /> Mark B Gilmartin <br /> MBG bhp <br /> Enclosures <br /> cc Ed Koberstein (w/out encl ) <br /> Michael J Infurna, Jr (w/enol) <br />