Laserfiche WebLink
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants <br /> The CPT and Hydropunchm test holes will be pressure grouted with bentonite after the <br /> groundwater samples have been taken. A standard operating guideline for the CPT installation <br /> ` and HydropunchTm sampling activities is attached in Appendix B of this work plan. The eight (8) <br /> proposed CPT tests can be completed in five to ten working days dependent on the depth of <br /> first encountered groundwater or shallow aquifer zone. <br /> In the event that a point source (or sources) of potential influence to groundwater is identified, <br /> installation of additional soil borings and sampling to delineate potential surface sources may be <br /> -- necessary. Source delineation soil sampling will be performed on an as-needed basis based <br /> primarily on analyses of monitoring well and CPT information. <br /> 2.7 Offsite Data Compilation <br /> No new offsite borings or monitoring wells are proposed at this time for sampling, since the <br /> Facility property is sufficiently large to retain monitoring wells onsite and define gradients. <br /> Available offsite groundwater elevations and groundwater quality data will be compiled to <br /> evaluate potential offsite influences on onsite groundwater. To characterize the regional <br /> groundwater and geology, the area of interest will be delineated in terms of township and range <br /> coordinates. The groundwater data that are from the same shallow groundwater aquifer beneath <br /> the Facility will be compiled. <br /> Data such as groundwater elevation, groundwater quality, and well completion logs that are <br /> available from the Department of Water Resources (DWR)will be compiled. Groundwater <br /> elevation data are generally reported in files of data prior to 1990 and another file of data from <br /> 1990 to present. 'typically, groundwater quality data includes a list by sample date of <br /> constituents analyzed as well as the units for those measurements. These two data sets <br /> generally are not characterized for the same wells. Well completion logs will also be requested <br /> for all drilled wells in the study area. <br /> 2.7.1 Data Interpretation <br /> Based on calculated gradients in Table 4, MW-1 and MW-3 are considered to be hydraulically <br /> downgradient of the process water land application areas and upgradient of sanitary wastewater <br /> septic tank and leach field systems. MW-2 may be considered to be located hydraulically <br /> upgradient of the process water land application areas, although MW-2 is slightly offset to the <br /> west and may not accurately represent background water quality directly upgradient of the land <br /> application areas. <br /> Based on concentration trend plots of MWA data in Figures 6 through 12, it can be interpreted <br /> that this well is more likely cross-gradient of the Facility in general due to the consistent relative <br /> concentration levels that are between the upgradient well MW-2 and those of the downgradient <br /> well MW-3. In fact, from a water chemistry standpoint MWA is more similar in concentration to <br /> the upgradient well MW-2 than that of MW-3. <br /> With the proposed additional wells MW-4 and MW-5, MW-2 can be more definitively classified. <br /> The volume and percentage of shallow groundwater that potentially passed through the screen <br /> intervals of each monitoring well and the total amount of groundwater flow into and out of <br /> Groundwater Protection Work Plan, The Wine Group Page 2-6 <br /> Franzia Winery, Ripon, California <br /> gvs9r waa+i.roM 3 CIT:?[_+:..'e��ryv4reporlslw_rvY.�fanifin��n9ac <br />