Laserfiche WebLink
FACT SHEET ORDER NO. R5-2002- -35- <br /> CITY OF STOCKTON <br /> REGIONAL WASTEWATER CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LATE REVISIONS <br /> err-e <br /> an the balanee, <br /> and the PP-1#1 <br /> The mean background concentrations of dibromochloromethane, 1,1-DCE, PCE, <br /> bromodichloromethane, and bis (2-ethyhexyl) phthalate exceeded the CTR criteria; therefore, <br /> the receiving water has no assimilative capacity for diluting these constituents. However on <br /> closer examination, it is apparent that the method reporting level for each of these constituents <br /> was greater than the criteria itself. Provision G.9 of this Order requires the Discharger to <br /> conduct additional monitoring to evaluate CTR priority pollutants, including organic human <br /> carcinogens, using appropriate reporting limits. Based on the findings of the study and the <br /> mixing zone study, discussed below, Regional Board staff will evaluate "reasonable potential' <br /> for the constituents to exceed criteria pursuant to the SIP, Section 1.3, Step 8, and reopen the <br /> permit to establish final effluent limitations. The final limitations may need to be adjusted <br /> appropriately such that the combined relative carcinogenic risk for all of the identified <br /> constituents is below 1 at a dilution of 10:1, riveneffluent, respectively. <br /> The SIP at 1.4.2.2.B requires, among other things, that when a mixing zone/dilution credit is <br /> granted, the permit must specify the point in the receiving water where the applicable <br /> criteria/objectives must be met. As of this time the Discharger has yet to perform such an <br /> analysis over a variety of flow conditions. However, considering the long-term averaging <br /> period for human carcinogens, the infrequency of critical conditions and worst-case effluent <br /> concentrations, and the fact that there are no drinking water intakes for numerous miles down- <br /> or up-stream of the discharge, the Regional Board finds the lack of a detailed mixing zone <br /> study is not significant enough to postpone the imposition of final effluent limitations for <br /> chloroform, dichloromethane, and TCE. The Discharger shall include in the Human <br /> Carcinogen Impact Study as described in Provision G.5, a mixing zone analysis of the effluent <br /> discharge into the SJR performed over various flow conditions to delineate the extent of the <br /> corresponding"human carcinogen" mixing zone (s). <br /> Additional interim reporting requirements, as discussed in Provisions G.6 and G.7, are as <br /> follows: <br /> • Preparation of a pollutant prevention and minimization program in compliance with <br /> CWC 13263.3(d)(3); and <br /> • Performance of an engineering treatment feasibility study examining the feasibility, <br /> costs and benefits of treatment to remove pollutants from the discharge. <br /> 11.4.3 Receiving Water Monitoring for Priority Pollutants Human Carcinogens <br /> Receiving water monitoring of human carcinogens will be required to provide assurance that <br /> water quality criteria are being met downstream of the mixing zone and that the beneficial use <br /> of municipal supply is being protected. Although a mixing zone analysis has not been <br /> performed to delineate the specific boundaries of the mixing zone for human carcinogens, the <br /> Regional Board finds that receiving water samples collected at the existing R-1 and R-8 <br /> receiving water monitoring locations should provide adequate information during the interim <br />