My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INFORMATION SHEET -3- <br /> CITY OF STOCKTON <br /> REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> than an instantaneous limit because the City's continuous (instantaneous) monitoring system <br /> coupled with the continuously varying nature of treatment plant operations would produce <br /> numerous violations of the instantaneous limitation. Many of these "violations" are of short <br /> duration due to a siphon discharge shutoff control system, have low TRC concentrations, and <br /> are not believed to be a significant threat to water quality. <br /> The City has not yet submitted final chlorine excursion information However, based on the <br /> similarities in the equipment used by the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, the <br /> effluent limitations are based on those in the permit issued to Sacramento Regional County <br /> Sanitation District. Stockton should be able to achieve similar limitations with its equipment. <br /> A Provision has been added to require the City to operate the chlorine residual control system <br /> and the siphon discharge shutoff to achieve the lowest chlorine residual level technically and <br /> operationally feasible, and to report all non-zero TRC concentration detected in the effluent (on <br /> a daily basis), as part of the Monitoring and Reporting Program. <br /> Total Coliform- <br /> Previous effluent limitations for total coliform organisms were set at 23 MPN/100 ml (monthly <br /> median), and 500 MPN/100 ml (daily maximum). However, with the river model information <br /> recently submitted, it has been determined that dilution available is less than 20:1. There is <br /> also water contact recreation in the vicinity of the discharge during the summer. Guidelines <br /> established by the Department of Health Services recommend that, under these conditions, <br /> effluent contain a median MPN of coliform organisms that does not exceed 2.2/100 ml. <br /> Therefore, this Order contains monthly median and daily maximum total coliform limits of <br /> 2.2/100 ml and 23/100 ml, respectively, from I May through 30 September, and monthly <br /> median and daily maximum limits of 23/100 ml and 500/100 ml, respectively, during the rest <br /> of the year. <br /> Ammonia- <br /> The river model contained information that indicates there is a potential for ammonia toxicity <br /> in the receiving water during the winter due to the discharge. This Order requires the City to <br /> monitor ammonia in both the effluent and receiving water, as well as conduct effluent chronic <br /> toxicity bioassays. The permit may be reopened and the effluent limitations modified as <br /> necessary to address toxicity issues. <br /> Temperature- <br /> The permit contains effluent and receiving water temperature limitations which are contained in <br /> the Thermal Plan. Because the City believes it is unclear how natural receiving water <br /> temperature (not already affected by other dischargers) is determined and the City does not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.