My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INFORMATION SHEET 5_ <br /> CITY OF STOCKTON <br /> REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Reasonable Potential to Exceed <br /> Federal regulations require effluent limitations for all pollutants that are or may be discharged at a <br /> level that will cause or have the reasonable potential to cause, or contribute to an in-stream excursion <br /> above a narrative or numerical water quality standard. <br /> The City of Stockton has been collecting water quality samples of the effluent and receiving water <br /> monthly since July 1993. The constituents evaluated included those which were regulated by the <br /> Inland Surface Waters Plan. To date results of nine sample events have been received. Of the <br /> results reviewed, all constituents appear to meet applicable water quality objectives, taking into <br /> account dilution and receiving water concentrations, with the exception of mercury. The water <br /> quality objectives for mercury include an acute 1-hour average of 2.4 µg/1 to protect freshwater <br /> aquatic life, and a 30-day average of 0.012 µg/1 to protect human health (due to bioaccumulation of <br /> mercury in fish tissue). Mercury was found at concentrations greater than 0.012 µg/I at every <br /> sampling station. <br /> Results make it appear that the mercury problem is ubiquitous throughout the receiving water during <br /> the winter period. However, the accuracy of mercury analyses at the low regulatory levels can be <br /> questionable without implementing 'clean technique' for sample collection, handling, and analysis. <br /> Therefore, this Order requires additional study to assess whether the levels of mercury in the <br /> discharge causes or contributes to an in-stream excursion above a water quality objective. If the <br /> discharge causes or contributes to an in-stream excursion above a water quality objective, then the <br /> City must submit information to calculate an effluent limit. Finally, the permit can be reopened to <br /> include the effluent limit. <br /> Chronic Toxicity Requirements <br /> The Basin Plan requires that there be no toxics in toxic amounts. This Order implements the Basin <br /> Plan by prohibiting toxic pollutants to be present in the water column, sediments, or biota in <br /> concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses; that produce detrimental response in human, <br /> plant, animal, or aquatic life; or that bioaccumulate in aquatic resources at levels which are harmful <br /> to human health. <br /> The Order requires effluent chronic toxicity testing to be conducted as specified in the Monitoring <br /> and Reporting Program, according to standard EPA protocol. If the testing indicates that the <br /> discharge causes, has the reasonable potential to cause, or contributes to an in-stream excursion <br /> above a water quality objective for toxicity, the Discharger must conduct a Toxicity Reduction <br /> Evaluation (TRE). The Order can be reopened and a chronic toxicity limitation or specific chemical <br /> toxicant included. Additionally, if a chronic toxicity water quality objective is adopted by the State <br /> Water Resources Control Board, this Order may be reopened and a limitation based on that objective <br /> included. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.