My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorand uiW <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD . CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3201 S Street Sacramento, California 95816 Phone: 445-0270 <br /> TO: Antonia K.J. Vorster FROM: Dan T. Ward <br /> Senior Engineer Area Engineer <br /> DATE: 10 July 1985 SIGNATURE: _ <br /> SUBJECT: SAN JOAQUIN RIVER FISH KILL, CONTINUED <br /> This memo updates my memo of 27 June 1985 on the same subject. <br /> UPDATE <br /> Attached are two tables describing: 1) effluent and river conditions from 17 <br /> May to 21 June, and 2 ) detailed effluent and operational data for 19 and 20 <br /> June. An analysis of these data as they relate to the fish kill is as follows: <br /> 1. The City of Stockton has been violating their chlorine residual require- <br /> ments occasionally for the past two months. (See Table 1 ) <br /> 2. On 19 June, to prevent further coliform violations , they attempted to <br /> achieve breakpoint chlorination. <br /> 3. From 1530 on 19 June to 1710 on 20 June the City discharged to the river <br /> approximately 25 million gallons of effluent, containing up to 10.5 ppm <br /> residual chlorine and with a pH of 3.1 to 4.9. <br /> 4. The estimated flow in the river was from 10 to 11 mgd, flowing upstream <br /> toward Vernalis. Therefore, treatment plant effluent made up an estimated <br /> two-thirds of total river flow. <br /> Additional pertinent information is as follows: <br /> 1. Chlorination (adding chlorine to wastewater treatment plant effluent) , is <br /> the process by which potentially disease-causing microorganisms are killed <br /> before the effluent is discharged to a watercourse. After effluent has <br /> been chlorinated, some chlorine sometimes remains in solution. This <br /> ' residual chlorine' must be removed by dechlorination facilities prior to <br /> dicharge. The City' s permit requires the residual chlorine level not <br /> exeed 0.02 ppm. <br /> 2. Chlorination of the effluent was ineffective for two weeks before the fish <br /> kill . This could have been due to high nitrite concentrations, suspended <br /> solids concentrations, organic matter concentrations, or other factors. <br /> These constituents contribute to chlorine demand. Chlorine demand is <br /> defined as the difference between the chlorine applied and the amount of <br /> residual chlorine remaining after chlorination. <br /> 3. The multi-media filters continue to be out of service. These filters <br /> remove suspended solids and therebv reduce chlorine demand. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.