Laserfiche WebLink
maintain compliance with any implementation permits, and to evaluate progress toward attain- <br /> ing the remedial objectives Also, monitoring will be used as a tool to manage the dissolved <br /> hydrocarbon plume and to momtor and document the presence of VOCs in groundwater <br /> beneath the site <br /> Institutional controls will be used to reduce the possibility of exposure to petroleum hydro- <br /> carbon-affected groundwater at, or from, the site Generally, this is accomplished by restrict- <br /> ing access Currently, access to hydrocarbon-affected groundwater is controlled by sampling <br /> protocol and general plume location Since impacted groundwater will persist for some time <br /> during remediation, use will be restricted by prohibiting installation of drinking water wells at, <br /> or near, the site Additionally, groundwater pumping that may draw affected groundwater <br /> away from the site will be restricted <br /> 5.3.2 Alternative 2: SVE/Air Sparging with Treatment <br /> In addition to groundwater monitoring and institutional controls and plume definition, this <br /> alternative includes (1) design and installation of SVE and sparge systems, designs would <br /> utilize existing wells when possible, and (2) subsurface infection of compounds found to be <br /> limiting bioreclamation (other than introduced by SVE and spargmg) This alternative would <br /> include additional design and abatement due to the presence of the VOCs which occur <br /> beneath the site <br /> Application of this alternative would require installation of a SVE system and integral sparge <br /> system Given the thickness of the capillary fringe soils, the SVE well field would be installed <br /> utilizing vadose wells screened in hydrocarbon impacted areas Sparge points, equipped with <br /> approximately 2 feet of screen, would be installed so that the top of the screened section <br /> would be approximately 5 feet below the average groundwater surface Operation of the <br /> sparge system, with respect to active sparge points and sparge duration, would be modified in <br /> order to optimize volatilization and biodegradation <br /> 5.4 Alternative Evaluation <br /> Technical, institutional, environmental safety, and economic criteria were used to evaluate the <br /> alternatives Because some remedial alternative elements were common to both alternatives <br /> (i e , complete downgradient plume definition), only the characteristic elements were consid- <br /> ered during the evaluation process It was determined that Alternative 1 is the most feasible <br /> for long-term application An assumption of this selection is that the extent of dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons downgradient of the site is minimal due to the limited nature of the release and <br /> the relatively low concentrations of dissolves detected on site In the case that plume delinea- <br /> tion uncovers conditions which would require additional evaluation regarding remediation an <br /> addendum to this CAP would be prepared <br /> 3201357B1CAP 12 April 4, 1995 <br />