Laserfiche WebLink
EPA Comments on the <br /> Draft Remedial Action Report <br /> for Institutional Controls at South Balloon Area <br /> January 2002 <br /> SPECIFIC COMMENTS <br /> 1. Section 1.4.7, Page 1-2: The text states that the Department of Defense (DOD) ...will <br /> ensure that the documents transferring real property out of federal control reflect the land <br /> use restrictions and enforcement mechanisms specified in the remedial decision <br /> document." The DDJC Sharpe Site is a post-ROD site and the Remedial Action Report <br /> (RAR) for Institutional Controls is a post-ROD document. The reference to "remedial <br /> decision document' would be more clear if it pluralized the term "document' (i.e., <br /> documents) and specifically identified the January 2002 Remedial Action Report for <br /> Institutional Controls (ICs). Please revise Section 1.4.7 of the RAR to pluralize the word <br /> "document" in the above referenced passage and to specifically reference the January <br /> 2002 Remedial Action Report for Institutional Controls. <br /> 2. Section 3.2.1.3, Page 3-2: The text states that "the DDJC-FA Environmental Project <br /> Manager shall notify the signatory parties to the FFA at least 90 days before the <br /> commencement of any demolition or construction activities that could expose <br /> contaminated soil." As stated in Section ES.2 of the Executive Summary,the intent of the <br /> ICs required by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) is "...to <br /> ensure that the proper precautions are taken during future disturbances of the surface soils <br /> and/or further remediation in the event land use is ever changed." The language provided <br /> in Section 3.2.1.3 is not sufficiently specific in regard to how a determination will be <br /> made whether the proposed activities will expose contaminated soil. Section 3.2.1.3 <br /> should be revised to provide more information on the references and procedures that will <br /> be used to determine whether"contaminated soil" will be disturbed by proposed <br /> activities. Section 4.2.1 of the Addendum to the Installation Master Plan should also be <br /> revised, accordingly. <br /> 3. Section 3.4.3, Page 3-3: The text describes the Five-Year Review Report that will be <br /> prepared to assess the ICs at the South Balloon Area. This section does not provide a <br /> provision for sending a copy of the Five-Year Review Report to the signatories of the <br /> FFA. The previous section of the Report, Section 3.4.2, Annual Inspection Report, does <br /> commit to providing copies of the Annual Inspection Report to the signatories of the FFA <br /> so it appears that the absence of similar language for the distribution of the Five-Year <br /> Review Report may be an oversight. Please revise Section 3.4.3 of the RAR to describe <br />