My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 3:26:58 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:23:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
705
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EPA Comments on the <br /> Draft Final OU 1 Groundwater: <br /> Interim Remedial Action Report <br /> dated March, 2001 <br /> GENERAL COMMENTS <br /> 1. The Record of Decision (ROD) for DDJC-Sharpe included an operational period of 16 <br /> years to restore groundwater to beneficial use. This Interim Remedial Action Report <br /> (IRAR) cites recent data, including a groundwater modeling effort by the Waterways <br /> Experiment Station, that suggest a cleanup time of 50 years or more. In addition, the <br /> IRAR states that several optimization actions are under consideration, including <br /> aggressive pumping, dynamic underground stripping/hydrous pyrolysis oxidation, and <br /> natural attenuation. The longer cleanup time poses a considerable increase in cleanup <br /> costs over the cost projected in the ROD, and the remedial technologies under <br /> consideration represent potentially significant or fundamental changes in strategy from <br /> the pump-and-treat system currently implemented as the selected remedy. The U.S. EPA <br /> ROD guidance (A Guide to Preparing Superfund Proposed Plans, Records of Decision, <br /> and Other Remedy Selection Decision Documents, EPA 540-R-98-031, July 1999) states <br /> that significant changes may require an Explanation of Significant Difference and <br /> fundamental changes may require a ROD Amendment, depending on the degree of post- <br /> ROD remedy changes selected for the DDJC-Sharpe site. <br /> SPECIFIC COMMENTS <br /> 2. Section 2.2.2, page 2-2: The second and third bullets discuss alternate pumping and <br /> pulse pumping of extraction wells as optimization actions specified in the ROD selected <br /> remedy. It is not clear from the IRAR whether these strategies have been employed at the <br /> DDJC-Sharpe site. Please clarify whether the optimization strategies specified in the <br /> ROD have been implemented and, if not, discuss why not. <br /> 3. Section 5.4, pages 5-3 and 5-4: The text cites the 1998 Version 2.0 of the DDJC- <br /> Sharpe/Tracy Comprehensive Field Work Plan in subsection 5.4.1 and Volume H <br /> (Quality Assurance Project Plan) of the Comprehensive Field Work Plan in subsection <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.